Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Salmon Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$122kHuman Services$74kHealth$47kReligion$39kArts & Culture$9kEducation$7k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,085
Median grant
1
States reached
$634k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPOLITAN INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION$7,372
YOUTH VILLAGES$6,000
SOUTHERN REINS CTR FOR EQUINE THERAPY$5,603
AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC$4,085
EMMANUEL EPISCOPAL CENTER$3,000
BODINE SCHOOL$3,000
CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY CARE ALLIANCE OF TN$1,392
PORTER-LEATH$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $4k → 17%METROPOLITAN INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION: $8k → 17%METROPOLITAN INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION: $8k → 17%METROPOLITAN INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION: $8k → 17%METROPOLITAN INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION: $8k → 17%METROPOLITAN INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION: $8k → 17%METROPOLITAN INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION: $7k → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$276k · 10 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$276k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+4%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    Metropolitan Inter-Faith Association
    8× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +33%
  • ER
    EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT
    7× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +17%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • YOUTH VILLAGES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +17%
  • SR
    SOUTHERN REINS CENTER FOR EQUINE THERAPY
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +4%
  • AC
    AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
2
Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare Inc

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
3
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Mississippi Methodist Hospital Rehabilitation Center Inc

In response to the love of god, the methodist rehabilitation center, is dedicated to the restoration and enhancement of the lives of those we serve. we are committed to excellence and leadership in the delivery of comprehensive…

Health
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis, Inc. sees a world where every family has what they need to ensure the best health outcomes for their children. They provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and…

Health
6
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
7
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) is one of the nation's longest serving and most prestigious academic medical centers. Through its historic bond with Vanderbilt University, VUMC cultivates distinguished research and educational…

Health
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
10
Michael Dunn Center

To empower individuals living with disabilities and challenges to gain independence

Human Services
11
Ut Medical Group Inc

To be a successful physician led, professionally managed medical practice that benefits our patients and our community, while supporting the UT Health Science Center's mission through clinical excellence, financial responsibility and a…

Health
12
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Porter-Leath; the most unlike its peers is Episcopal Relief and Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF THE MID SOUTH: $121,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE MID SOUTHMetropolitan Inter-Faith Association: $63,372 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Inter-Faith AssociationEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $34,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENTYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGES INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'…CHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $20,000 · HealthCHURCH HEALTH CEN…SOUTHERN REINS CENTER FOR EQUINE THERAPY: $5,603 · HealthSOUTHERN REINS CE…EMMANUEL EPISCOPAL CENTER: $4,750 · OtherAGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $4,085 · OtherCHILDREN'S EMERGENCY CARE ALLIANCE OF TN: $1,392 · OtherGREATER MEMPHIS ARTS COUNCIL: $1,000 · OtherPORTER-LEATH: $800 · OtherDixon Gallery and Gardens: $5,250 · Arts & CultureARTSMEMPHIS: $2,500 · Arts & CultureMADONNA LEARNING CENTER INCORPORATED: $3,500 · EducationBODINE OF GERMANTOWN INC: $3,000 · Education
Philanthropy$121,500Human Services$103,372Health$46,103Other$12,027Arts & Culture$7,750Education$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MID SOUTH: $121,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMetropolitan Inter-Faith Association: $63,372 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $34,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $20,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN REINS CENTER FOR EQUINE THERAPY: $5,603 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDixon Gallery and Gardens: $5,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $4,085 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADONNA LEARNING CENTER INCORPORATED: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBODINE OF GERMANTOWN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTSMEMPHIS: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPORTER-LEATH: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MID SOUTH ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Inter-Faith Association ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN REINS CENTER FOR EQUINE THERAPY ↗
  • Who funds Dixon Gallery and Gardens ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MADONNA LEARNING CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BODINE OF GERMANTOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTSMEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds PORTER-LEATH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Plough FoundationFL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Plough Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Thomas W Briggs Foundation Inc · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · United Way of the Mid South · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Belz Foundation · Jr Hyde III Family Foundation · David C and Pamela N Anderson Private Foundation · The McDonnell Family Foundation · Lawrence Lewis Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Salmon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Salmon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Salmon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph