Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Saint Joseph Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$363k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$318kHousing & Shelter$236kHealth$122kEducation$98kEnvironment$94kRecreation & Sports$64kReligion$62kYouth Development$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POVERELLO HOUSE$85,000
SAN JOAQUIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL$31,400
BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS$30,000
CAPUCHIN MISSIONARIES$30,000
HOLY CROSS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL$26,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FRESNO$25,000
SAINT ANTHONYS SCHOOL$25,000
CENCAL YOUTH SPORTS$25,000
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$18,000
LIVE AGAIN FRESNO$15,000
SAINT HELENS SCHOOL$14,000
Individual grant recipient$10,100
PHILANTHROPY INSPIRE BY THE NEEDS OF OUR COMMUNITY$7,500
FRESNO ARTS COUNCIL$3,000
SAINT AGNES FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $407k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $100k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $63k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $50k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $50k → 19%LIVE AGAIN FRESNO: $41k → 19%LIVE AGAIN FRESNO: $33k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $25k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $25k → 19%LIVE AGAIN FRESNO: $15k → 19%LIVE AGAIN FRESNO: $4k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $205 → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FRESNO: $178 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 61% of The Saint Joseph Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 39%.

The Saint Joseph Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$782k · 5 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$782k
$55k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterAnimalsEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fresno
    8× · 2017–2025 · $313k · revenue +64%
  • PH
    Poverello House
    4× · 2022–2025 · $236k · revenue +144%
  • LA
    LIVE AGAIN FRESNO
    4× · 2020–2025 · $94k · revenue +470%

Funded once

  • NH
    NAZARETH HOUSE FRESNO
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • DO
    DIOCESE OF FRESNO- MISIONERAS EUCARISTICAS DE MARIA INMACULADA
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • DO
    DIOCESE OF FRESNO - PASTORAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of Yolo-Solano

Our mission is to reach out and provide assistance to anyone in need in our community, especially the poor and disadvantaged. we offer health and social service programs that contribute to the individual's freedom and independence, while…

—
2
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
3
H E L P Helping Everyone Live Purposefully

Driving volunteer efforts for the State of CA via communities

Human Services
4
Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families

Hands of Hope works to enhance the quality of life in the Yuba-Sutter area by: Providing core support services to the homeless; Reintegrating the homeless within our community; Engaging the community to respond to the challenge of…

Housing & Shelter
5
Fresno Area Community Enterprises Inc

To meet the needs of struggling families living in poverty.

—
6
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
7
Rape Counseling Services of Fresno

The organization works to end rape and sexual violence and empower survivors while supporting safe, consensual relationships.

Health
8
Heart of the Redwoods Community Hospice

Providing physical, emotional, practical and spiritual support for people and families who are dealing with life-threatening illness, the dying process, death and or bereavement of a loved one.

Human Services
9
City of Refuge Sacramento

City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…

Human Services
10
Fremont Family Resource Center Corporation

To improve the quality of life and strengthen individuals youth and families through services and activities.

Community Improvement
11
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Santa Rosa

Catholic charities creates access to opportunities for self-sufficiency by providing innovative and compassionate services to people of all backgrounds, beliefs, and cultures.

Human Services
12
Access California Services

Access California Services is a culturally sensitive community-based organization dedicated to empowering underserved populations, with a focus on Arab- American & Muslim- American communities. We strive to enhance quality of life & foster…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy Inspired By the Needs of Our Community Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fresno: $313,055 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of the Diocese of FresnoLIVE AGAIN FRESNO: $93,520 · Human ServicesLIVE AGAIN FRESNOSAN JOAQUIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $31,400 · OtherSAN JOAQUIN MEMORIAL HIGH…CAPUCHIN MISSIONARIES: $30,000 · OtherCAPUCHIN MISSIONARIESBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS: $30,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SIST…HOLY CROSS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL: $26,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS JUNIOR HIGH SC…SAINT ANTHONYS SCHOOL: $25,000 · OtherSAINT ANTHONYS SCHOOLNAZARETH HOUSE FRESNO: $24,821 · OtherNAZARETH HOUSE FRESNODIOCESE OF FRESNO- MISIONERAS EUCARISTICAS DE MARIA INMACULADA: $24,821 · OtherDIOCESE OF FRESNO- MISION…SAINT HELENS SCHOOL: $14,000 · OtherSAINT HELENS SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $10,100 · Other+11 more: $20,500 · Other+11 morePoverello House: $236,410 · Housing & ShelterPoverello HouseThe Heart of the Horse Therapy Ranch: $78,867 · AnimalsCENCAL YOUTH SPORTS: $60,000 · EducationBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $18,000 · HealthPHILANTHROPY INSPIRED BY THE NEEDS OF OUR COMMUNITY INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyRAMBIS CHARITABLE GROUP INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyFresno Arts Council Inc: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$406,575Other$236,642Housing & Shelter$236,410Animals$78,867Education$60,000Health$18,000Philanthropy$10,000Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCatholic Charities of the Diocese of Fresno: $313,055 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetPoverello House: $236,410 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLIVE AGAIN FRESNO: $93,520 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetThe Heart of the Horse Therapy Ranch: $78,867 over 2y, 11% of budgetCENCAL YOUTH SPORTS: $60,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFresno Arts Council Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAMBIS CHARITABLE GROUP INC: $2,500 over 1y, 9.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fresno ↗
  • Who funds Poverello House ↗
  • Who funds LIVE AGAIN FRESNO ↗
  • Who funds The Heart of the Horse Therapy Ranch ↗
  • Who funds CENCAL YOUTH SPORTS ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPY INSPIRED BY THE NEEDS OF OUR COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Fresno Arts Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAMBIS CHARITABLE GROUP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Saint Joseph Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Saint Joseph Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Saint Joseph Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Saint Joseph Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Saint Joseph’s filings →

    More from the funding graph