Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ryan Evans Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$680k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.2MYouth Development$1.2MHuman Services$900kCrime & Legal$480kAnimals$145kPhilanthropy$101kEmployment$95k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $500k
$36,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST FRANCIS SCHOOL$200,000
CHESTERSON ACADEMY$150,000
GRANDMA'S HOUSE$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TULARE COUNTY$50,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$36,000
BIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS$36,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$36,000
DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$36,000
CASA OF TULARE COUNTY$36,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $36k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $20k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $20k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 11%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $30k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $25k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $20k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $20k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 13 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$3.8M
$222k

Still filing today

46%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TULARE COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $609k · revenue +31%
  • VO
    Valley Oak SPCA
    7× · 2017–2023 · $145k · revenue +68%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $111k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • LU
    LINDSAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $155k
  • PY
    PRO YOUTH HEART
    one grant, 2017 · $67k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulare County Deputy Sheriffs Benevolent Association

Enhance the community quality of life

Youth Development
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Fresno and Madera Counties

CASA of Fresno and Madera Counties is a 501(c)3 community based nonprofit organization whose mission is to recruit, train, and support citizen volunteers to advocate and speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in the…

Civil Rights
3
California State Firefighters Association

We are dedicated to ensuring our members a strong and united voice in the evolution of the Fire Service through unity in leadership political action education and quality member services.

Community Improvement
4
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Kern County

To provide specially trained volunteers to represent the best interests of children under protection of the juvenile court because of abuse or neglect.

Civil Rights
5
Court Appointed Special Advocates (Casa) of Merced County

Advocate for foster care children in courts. Providing quality intervention and advocacy services for abused, abandoned, and neglected children.

Crime & Legal
6
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
7
The Desert Sanctuary Inc

To provide shelter and counseling for victims of domestic violence in the Barstow area.

Human Services
8
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
9
Central Valley Foster Care Inc

Operation of a foster family care agency

Human Services
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc

Recruit, train and supervise volunteers to advocate for abused, neglected and abandoned children placed in foster homes. CASA volunteers ensure children's best interests remain the priority and their needs met while working to establish a…

—
11
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

—
12
Valley Residential Services

Valley Residential Services provides personalized support in safe, comfortable home environments for developmentally disabled individuals, residences for veterans with rehabilitation opportunities, and family assistance services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services of Tulare County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Desert Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRANDMA'S HOUSE: $683,750 · OtherGRANDMA'S HOUSEBIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS: $519,875 · OtherBIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERSCASA: $443,875 · OtherCASALINDSAY DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $400,000 · OtherLINDSAY DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARSST FRANCIS SCHOOL: $300,000 · OtherST FRANCIS SCHOOLCHESTERSON ACADEMY: $250,000 · OtherCHESTERSON ACADEMYLINDSAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $155,000 · Other+3 more: $168,125 · Other+3 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TULARE COUNTY INC: $608,875 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLU…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $111,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesValley Oak SPCA: $145,000 · AnimalsSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $111,000 · EducationDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $101,000 · PhilanthropyCASA OF TULARE COUNTY: $36,000 · Civil Rights
Other$2,920,625Youth Development$608,875Human Services$216,000Animals$145,000Education$111,000Philanthropy$101,000Civil Rights$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TULARE COUNTY INC: $608,875 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetValley Oak SPCA: $145,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $111,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $111,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY INC: $105,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $101,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AND EMPLOYMENT TRAINING INC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCASA OF TULARE COUNTY: $36,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TULARE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Valley Oak SPCA ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES AND EMPLOYMENT TRAINING INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TULARE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ryan Evans Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ryan Evans Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ryan Evans’ filings →

More from the funding graph