Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ruth and Edward Austin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$522kEducation$242kPhilanthropy$82kAnimals$35kRecreation & Sports$25kEnvironment$18kHuman Services$13kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Families SCN2A Foundation$40,000
Eisenhower Medical Center$35,500
MD Anderson$10,000
Harmon Recovery Foundation$10,000
Columbia University$10,000
University of Incarnate Word$5,000
Desert Community Found Eldorado CC Scholarship$3,000
Desert Community Fnd Toscana Scholarship Fund$2,000
United Way$2,000
Hoover Institution$2,000
San Antonio Muesuem of Art$1,000
Madeira School$1,000
Trinity University$1,000
Blind Book Club$1,000
South Texas Property Rights Assn$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $2k → 14%MCC Foundation Inc: $15k → 17%MCC Foundation Inc: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Ruth and Edward Austin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Ruth and Edward Austin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$941k · 44 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
20

Total granted

$941k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+69%

Still filing today

50%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $228k · revenue +94%
  • TF
    THE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $121k · revenue +409%
  • SM
    SAINT MARYS HALL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $22k · revenue -21%
  • MC
    Manhattan Childrens Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • CA
    Children's Academy
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Southwestern Health Resources

To further the missions of utsw and thr on a local, regional and national level through the creation of a clinically integrated network of physicians, hospitals and other care providers to deliver healthcare across the continuum and by…

Health
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Baylor College of Medicine

Baylor college of medicine (bcm) is committed to advancing human health through the integration of patient care, research, education, and community services.

Education
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
11
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
12
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of the Incarnate Word; the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warrior Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
29/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Eisenhower Medical Center: $228,000 · HealthEisenhower Medical CenterTHE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION INC: $121,000 · HealthTHE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION INCTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $40,000 · HealthTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE+5 more: $14,500 · HealthThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: $102,000 · OtherThe University of Texas MD Anderson Can…Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBuckley School: $30,000 · OtherBuckley SchoolCeasar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute: $18,000 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY INC: $18,000 · OtherHarmon Foundation: $15,000 · Other+33 more: $184,000 · Other+33 moreSAINT MARYS HALL INC: $41,000 · EducationSAINT MARYS HALL INCTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $31,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF…UCLA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $22,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFOR…University of the Incarnate Word: $18,000 · EducationUniversity of the Inc…The Madeira School: $16,000 · EducationThe Madeira SchoolDUKE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist University: $10,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $10,000 · EducationTrinity University: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $8,000 · EducationDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $46,500 · PhilanthropyCHARITY BALL LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyHARMON RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $9,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMCC FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTexas Agricultural Land Trust: $6,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Environment
Health$403,500Other$397,000Education$212,000Philanthropy$51,500Arts & Culture$50,000Human Services$18,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $228,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION INC: $121,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $46,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT MARYS HALL INC: $41,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHARMON RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $31,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of the Incarnate Word: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMCC FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetThe Madeira School: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York and Presbyterian Hospital: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity University: $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAN'S PROPERTY RIGHTS ASSOCIATION INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTexas Agricultural Land Trust: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEXAS GOLF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJIMMY LEE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5,000 over 5y, 9.5% of budgetTHE CHILD STUDY CENTER OF NEW YORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BLIND BROOK CLUB INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITY BALL LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSCPGA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUSSGA MEMORIAL FUND INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Texas Charity Weekend Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Heart Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Santa Rosa Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILIESCN2A FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARYS HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HARMON RECOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of the Incarnate Word ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds MCC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Madeira School ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds The New York and Presbyterian Hospital ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Trinity University ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAN'S PROPERTY RIGHTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Agricultural Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds THE TEXAS GOLF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992TX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · The Brown Foundation Inc · Joseph & Martye Rubin Foundation · The Ewing Halsell Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Ld Ormsby Charitable Foundation Inc · Fb Doane Foundation · The Jesse H and Susan R Oppenheimer Foundation · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Amy Shelton McNutt Charitable Trust · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ruth and Edward Austin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ruth and Edward Austin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ruth and Edward Austin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ruth and Edward Austin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ruth and Edward Austin’s filings →

More from the funding graph