· Private foundation
The Russell & Ronalee Galbut Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of THE RUSSELL & RONALEE GALBUT FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k35 grants · $103k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $294k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
- $250k+1 grant · $428k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KETER ABRAHAM OF CHABAD INC | $428,000 |
| COLEL CHABAD | $51,000 |
| EZRAT ISRAEL | $36,800 |
| GIFT OF LIFE BONE MARROW FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| CAPT HYMAN P GALBUT JLC | $28,000 |
| CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHWEST BROWARD | $26,000 |
| DAUGHTERS OF ISRAEL MIKVA | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $23,000 |
| CHABAD OF SOUTH BEACH INC | $18,600 |
| FEDERAL DRUG AGENTS FOUNDATION INC | $16,000 |
| JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| YEHUDI INC | $13,600 |
| GREATER MIAMI HEBREW ACADEMY | $11,000 |
| BESSIE D GALBUT CHARITABLE FUND | $11,000 |
| GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
90 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GMGreater Miami Hebrew Academy4× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +78%
- FCFriendship Circle of Miami Beach and North Dade Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $71k · revenue +396%
- GOGIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC5× · 2019–2024 · $62k · revenue +122%
Funded once
- SMSWC MUSEUM CORPone grant, 2023 · $250k
- CMCHICAGO MEZUZAH AND MITZVAH CAMPAIGNone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +13%
- HSHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $36k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.
The center for jewish life is a kehillah-an important hub for the entire central miami community. the center is a home-base for jewish communal life and living.
Our school is run on a system of mutual respect, for teachers, administration and students. in a warm and caring environment, full of creativity and multi-faceted approaches to education, we ignite a spark in each girl to love hashem and…
The gainesville jewish student foundation, inc. (known as schilit hillel at uf) mission: schilit hillel at uf enriches the lives of jewish students, inspiring them to make an enduring commitment to jewish life, learning, and israel
To provide, and guide other schools in providing, an education in both jewish and secular studies that meet the needs of the invididual student, and which empowers each student to reach his/her highest level of independent and…
Enrich the lives of jewish students
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…
Provide educational services to jewish families and financial support to jewish educators and scholars both domestically and in israel. provide community outreach, counseling and spiritual guidance to jewish families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Falic Family Private Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
121 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 121 of the 247 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHICAGO MEZUZAH AND MITZVAH CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds Greater Miami Hebrew Academy ↗
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds Friendship Circle of Miami Beach and North Dade Inc ↗
- Who funds Federal Drug Agents Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI BEACH JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAMILLUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds Yehudi Inc ↗
- Who funds ANSHEI LUBAVITCH INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds DANIELLA MOFFSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · The Ejnra Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · United Way Miami Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Falic Family Private Foundation · Peacock Foundation Inc · The Slomo and Cindy Silvian Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Russell & Ronalee Galbut Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Voices for Children Foundation Inc — 48% of income from government
- United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
- Camillus House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jackson Health Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Young Musicians Unite Inc — 0% of income from government
- Miami Children's Museum Inc Fka Miami Youth Museum — 0% of income from government
- New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
- Unidad of Miami Beach Inc — 0% of income from government
- Yehudi Inc — 0% of income from government
- Helping Hands Food Ko Op Inc — 0% of income from government
- Educate Tomorrow Corp — 0% of income from government
- Torah Academy of Boca Raton Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Aleph Institute Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Russell & Ronalee Galbut Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Russell & Ronalee Galbut Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.