Skip to content

· Private foundation

The RSW Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$291kFood & Nutrition$138kHealth$82kHuman Services$77kPublic Safety & Disaster$49kHousing & Shelter$28kEducation$19kReligion$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$4,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$471k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Path from Poverty$12,000
Doctors Without Borders USA$11,000
Arm in Arm$9,500
Save the Children$6,000
Northwest Harvest$5,000
American Red Cross of Central NJ$5,000
Atlanta Community Food Bank$4,500
Habitat for Humanity$4,000
Everett Gospel Mission$4,000
Trenton Area Soup Kitchen$4,000
World Food Program USA$3,500
Planned Parenthood$3,000
City of Refuge$2,500
ASPCA$1,000
Cascade PBS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%World Food Program USA: $4k → 14%Arm in Arm: $10k → 11%American Breast Cancer Foundation: $1k → 6%World Food Program USA: $4k → 14%Arm in Arm: $9k → 11%American Breast Cancer Foundation: $1k → 6%World Food Program USA: $4k → 14%Arm in Arm: $9k → 11%World Food Program USA: $4k → 14%World Food Program USA: $3k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $2k → 14%Everett Gospel Mission: $3k → 9%Arm in Arm: $6k → 11%Everett Gospel Mission: $4k → 9%Everett Gospel Mission: $4k → 9%Everett Gospel Mission: $4k → 9%Learning Ally: $4k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $3k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $3k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $3k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $2k → 11%Learning Ally: $2k → 11%Learning Ally: $2k → 11%Learning Ally: $2k → 11%Arm in Arm: $7k → 11%ARM IN ARM: $6k → 11%ARM IN ARM: $6k → 11%ARM IN ARM: $6k → 11%ARM IN ARM: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
NJ
CT
VA
MD
AR
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$690k · 25 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
4

Total granted

$690k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+146%

Still filing today

80%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionReligionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +98%
  • WE
    WOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL DBA PATH FROM POVERTY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $103k · revenue +24%
  • ARM IN ARM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • WE
    WOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL - SEATTLE
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH (USA) DISASTER RELIEF
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • HI
    Heifer International
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
3
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
4
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
5
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
8
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
9
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
10
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
11
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
12
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $108,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCWOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL DBA PATH FROM POVERTY: $102,500 · InternationalWOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL DBA PATH …Save The Children Federation Inc: $54,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc+3 more: $9,000 · InternationalNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $47,500 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $30,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODAmerican Red Cross of Central NJ: $25,000 · OtherAmerican Red Cross of Centra…Habitat for Humanity: $23,500 · OtherHabitat for HumanityAMERICAN RED CROSS OF CENTRAL NEW JERSEY: $19,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS OF CENTRA…WOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL - SEATTLE: $15,400 · OtherWOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNAT…The Children's Health Fund: $8,000 · Other+4 more: $11,500 · Other+4 moreARM IN ARM INC: $62,000 · Human ServicesARM IN ARM INCLearning Ally Inc: $19,100 · Human ServicesLearning Ally IncFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $18,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WOR…EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $15,000 · Human ServicesEVERETT GOSPEL MIS…+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesTASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc: $51,000 · Food & NutritionTASK Inc Tr…ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $21,000 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COM…American Diabetes Association: $18,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $12,500 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $10,500 · HealthCITY OF REFUGE: $15,500 · ReligionWellspring Living Inc: $2,500 · ReligionTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $9,000 · AnimalsTHE ORIANNE SOCIETY: $500 · AnimalsJEKYLL ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
International$274,000Other$179,900Human Services$116,600Food & Nutrition$72,000Health$41,000Religion$18,000Animals$9,500Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $108,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL DBA PATH FROM POVERTY: $102,500 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetARM IN ARM INC: $62,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $54,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc: $51,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $47,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $19,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $18,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE: $15,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEKYLL ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWellspring Living Inc: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInsulin For Life USA Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL DBA PATH FROM POVERTY ↗
  • Who funds ARM IN ARM INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Health Fund ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEKYLL ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds THE ORIANNE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Insulin For Life USA Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The RSW Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The RSW Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Arm in Arm Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The RSW Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The RSW Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on RSW’s filings →

More from the funding graph