Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Royer Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$946k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.2MReligion$848kFood & Nutrition$576kEmployment$474kHousing & Shelter$288kCommunity Improvement$168kEducation$153kHealth$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $783k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REFUGE PLACE INTERNATIONAL$200,000
FAITH HEALING DEVELOPMNT ORG$151,330
CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN$135,000
SIERRA LEONE MISSION & DEVELOPMENT$125,000
FOUND IN TRANSLATION$100,000
RURAL YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIO$72,000
AFCAIDS$38,000
HORIZONS PROGRAM$25,000
BRETHREN HOUSING ASSOCIATION$25,000
BREAD AND WATER FOR AFRICA$24,500
LGBT ASYLUM TASK FORCE$15,000
CHESTNUT HOUSING$10,000
THE CENTER AT HAMPTON HOUSE$10,000
HOPE WALKS$7,000
NEW COMMUNITY PROJECT$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 54% of grant dollars ($2.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 46% that went abroad ($1.8M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $6k → 8%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $6k → 8%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 46% of all-years giving ($1.8M)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Liberia$945k · 6 grants
Sierra Leone$666k · 9 grants
Haiti$135k · 1 grant
Congo (Kinshasa)$70k · 3 grants
Rwanda$5k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Royer Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Royer Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 53% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 13 repeat orgs$392k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +144% since the first grant, against +100% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$3.6M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+144%
+100%

Still filing today

46%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $312k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    Found in Translation Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $474k · revenue +144%
  • NC
    New Community Project
    3× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +251%
  • CH
    CHESTNUT HOUSING CORPORATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • GT
    GATHERING TOGETHER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $55k
  • SL
    SIERRA LEONE MISSIONS AND DEVELOPMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
2
Home for Homeless Women
—
3
Vision for Life

To impact community housing

Housing & Shelter
4
Bridging Initiatives International

Provide holistic and integrated service that address the diverse needs of vulnerable individuals and families experiencing instability as the result of domestic violence and /or homelessness.

Human Services
5
Lydia House International

"Lydia House" is a residential Christian women's home to be built in Gbarnga, Liberia (West Africa) under the local leadership of our partners, Pastors Owen and Viola Dunbar. Lydia House will offer provision, medical care, and vocational…

International
6
Lancaster Housing Services Incorporated
Housing & Shelter
7
Healing Hand Ministries Inc

To support the women in liberia who are

International
8
Born Again Ministries

To provide or connect low -income or ex-offenders affordable houses who wouldn't otherwise have the opportunity to have a bighter future

Health
9
Homes for Change
Human Services
10
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Greater Mount Airy Area Habitat for Humanity…

—
11
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
12
New Horizon Community Develpom

The mission is to provide quailty affordable housing alternatives for the people of Plaqumine

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brethren Housing Association; the most unlike its peers is Sierra Leone Missions and Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REFUGE PLACE INTERNATIONAL: $945,000 · OtherREFUGE PLACE INTERNATIONALCHURCH OF THE BRETHREN: $848,400 · OtherCHURCH OF THE BRETHRENFAITH HEALING DEVELOPMNT ORG: $374,776 · OtherFAITH HEALING DEVELOPMNT ORGBRETHREN HOUSING ASSOCIATION: $268,000 · OtherBRETHREN HOUSING ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $171,391 · OtherRURAL YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIO: $163,111 · OtherHORIZONS PROGRAM: $153,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE BRETHREN: $135,000 · OtherSIERRA LEONE MISSION & DEVELOPMENT: $125,000 · Other+5 more: $143,290 · OtherFound in Translation Inc: $474,000 · EducationFound in Tran…GATHERING TOGETHER INC: $55,000 · InternationalSIERRA LEONE MISSIONS AND DEVELOPMENT: $25,000 · InternationalNew Community Project: $26,000 · Community ImprovementCHESTNUT HOUSING CORPORATION: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF CUMBERLAND & PERRY COUNTIES: $18,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER AT HAMPTON HOUSE: $15,000 · Health
Other$3,326,968Education$474,000International$80,000Community Improvement$26,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Human Services$18,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFound in Translation Inc: $474,000 over 7y, 9.9% of budgetBRETHREN HOUSING ASSOCIATION: $268,000 over 7y, 9.6% of budgetNew Community Project: $26,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSIERRA LEONE MISSIONS AND DEVELOPMENT: $25,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCHESTNUT HOUSING CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF CUMBERLAND & PERRY COUNTIES: $18,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER AT HAMPTON HOUSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Found in Translation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRETHREN HOUSING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GATHERING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds New Community Project ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA LEONE MISSIONS AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds CHESTNUT HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF CUMBERLAND & PERRY COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER AT HAMPTON HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Royer Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Royer Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Royer Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Royer Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Royer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph