Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rothman Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Arts & Culture$46kHealth$27kYouth Development$5kEnvironment$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$200k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAZZ POWER INITIATIVE$13,200
ROMEMU$10,000
DANBURY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
BRIDGEWATER FIRE DEPARTMENT$2,500
FRACTURED ATLAS$1,000
NORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%EAST END HOSPICE: $1k → 7%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMS: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106k · 8 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$106k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+38%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JD
    JAZZ DRAMA PROGRAM
    5× · 2017–2021 · $42k · revenue +360%
  • FS
    FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • FRACTURED ATLAS INC
    2× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +34%
  • BL
    Bridgewater Land Trustgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue ×29
  • EE
    East End Hospice Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
2
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
3
The Mount Sinai Medical Center

Provide fundraising, support, and maintains pooled investments for entities of the mount sinai health system, inc.

Health
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
New York Eye & Ear Infirmary

To provide patient care at the highest quality, most technologically advanced and consistent multidisciplinary care in an environment where the safety, dignity and comfort of each patient are paramount. in delivering patient care, new york…

Health
10
Windham Community Memorial Hospital Inc

The mission of Windham Community Memorial Hospital is to offer comprehensive services in an environment where innovation and teaching are integral to care; where we are proud to serve patients and one another; where meeting the challenge…

Health
11
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
12
MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bridgewater Land Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEHILAT ROMEMU: $25,400 · OtherKEHILAT ROMEMUDANBURY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherDANBURY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJAZZ DRAMA PROGRAM: $41,700 · Arts & CultureJAZZ DRAMA PROGRAMFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $4,450 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INCMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesEast End Hospice Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentBridgewater Land Trust: $1,000 · EnvironmentBRIDGEWATER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $2,500 · Public Safety & DisasterCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Health
Other$50,900Arts & Culture$46,150Human Services$5,500Recreation & Sports$5,000Environment$3,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,500Health$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJAZZ DRAMA PROGRAM: $41,700 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $4,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEWATER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBridgewater Land Trust: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEast End Hospice Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rothman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rothman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rothman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Rothman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rothman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph