Skip to content
The Rosewood Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Rosewood Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$98kYouth Development$14kEducation$11kInternational$11kCrime & Legal$10kHuman Services$5kHealth$3kArts & Culture$1k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$559k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARISH CHURCH AT HABERSHAM$12,500
JUMPSTART$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TAKE HEART MISSIONS INC: $2k → 13%TAKE HEART MISSIONS INC: $2k → 13%TAKE HEART MISSIONS INC: $2k → 13%TAKE HEART MISSIONS INC: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
CA
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$107k · 13 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
18

Total granted

$107k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+51%

Still filing today

38%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHealthEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    A2S Access to Success
    4× · 2018–2022 · $7k · revenue +95%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +3%
  • PR
    PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF STANLY COUNTY INC
    2× · 2017–2022 · $2k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • CC
    CITY CHURCH NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • MT
    MISSION TO THE WORLD PCA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • LN
    Leadertreks NFPgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
3
Trinity Christian Fellowship Inc

Gospel mission

Religion
4
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
5
Mission Quest

Mission quest exists to glorify god by assisting christian missionaries and to reach the nations with the message of faith, grace, and victory through jesus christ. this is accomplished through mobilizing and support of missionaries and…

Youth Development
6
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
7
MissionNext Inc

To connect God's people with the good works He is preparing them to do for Kingdom impact. We accomplish this through our Web-based matching services known as MissionNext Journey and MissionNext Education and and by working closely with…

—
8
Servenow

Sharing Christ's Passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services
9
Global Servants Inc

Christian world-wide missions and ministries to see lives changed by the power and truth of Gods Word.

Religion
10
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
11
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
12
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jumpstart South Carolina; the most unlike its peers is Take Heart Missions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARISH CHURCH AT HABERSHAM: $17,500 · OtherPARISH CHURCH AT HABERSHAMFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHPCA REFORMED UNIVERSITY MINISTRIES: $15,500 · OtherPCA REFORMED UNIVERSITY MINISTRIESCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $12,700 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTWEST CHARLOTTE CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherWEST CHARLOTTE CHURCHPCA REFORMED UNIVERSITY MINISTRIES: $6,000 · OtherPCA REFORMED UNIVERSITY MINISTRIESBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC: $3,800 · Other+16 more: $28,800 · Other+16 moreJUMPSTART SOUTH CAROLINA: $10,000 · Crime & LegalA2S Access to Success: $7,000 · InternationalSpirit of America Worldwide: $1,500 · InternationalTAKE HEART MISSIONS INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesDistrict School: $5,000 · EducationTRINITY ACADEMY INC: $3,000 · EducationLeadertreks NFP: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $1,500 · HealthNEW SONG HEALTH CENTER BOLINGBROOK CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER: $1,000 · Health
Other$110,300Crime & Legal$10,000International$8,500Human Services$8,000Education$8,000Housing & Shelter$3,000Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAKE HEART MISSIONS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetA2S Access to Success: $7,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDistrict School: $5,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC: $3,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY ACADEMY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCING NATIVE MISSIONS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERGE GLOBAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpirit of America Worldwide: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCORE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA THEATRE CONFERENCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUMPSTART SOUTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds TAKE HEART MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds A2S Access to Success ↗
  • Who funds District School ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LOWCOUNTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadertreks NFP ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCING NATIVE MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Spirit of America Worldwide ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF STANLY COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY ↗
  • Who funds NEW SONG HEALTH CENTER BOLINGBROOK CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SCORE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Streetlife Ministries ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA THEATRE CONFERENCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…GiveClear FoundationRenaissance Charitabl…The Winston-Salem Fou…Servant FoundationRaymond James Charita…United Way WorldwideFoundation for the Ca…The US Charitable Gif…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA14.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · GiveClear Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · United Way Worldwide · Foundation for the Carolinas · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rosewood Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rosewood Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rosewood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home