Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rosemont Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$552kEducation$169kHealth$56kEnvironment$32kInternational$26kHuman Services$19kPublic Benefit$17kCivil Rights$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Last Resort$20,000
ASPCA$6,000
Big Dogs Huge Paws$5,000
UNRWA USA$5,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$5,000
Eleventh Hour Rescue$5,000
New Jersey Conservation Foundation$5,000
MADRE$5,000
Shriners Children's$5,000
SPCALA$5,000
Underhound Railroad Inc$5,000
World Food Program USA$5,000
Freedom Farm Animal Rescue Inc$5,000
Mercy for Animals$5,000
Animal Legal Defense Fund$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Underhound Railroad Inc: $5k → 8%The Brian P Stack Civic Association: $300 → 14%FISHERMAN'S MARK: $1k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$748k · 39 repeat orgs$207k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
59

Total granted

$748k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+21%

Still filing today

74%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +207%
  • TS
    THE STORM KING SCHOOL
    2× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +13%
  • MF
    MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • AH
    ALMOST HOME WELLNESS CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $19k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
The Animal Rescue League
Animals
3
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
6
Tri County Humane Society

Tri-county animal rescue is a no-kill, nonprofit animal shelter working to prevent the killing of over 573,000 unwanted pets in broward, miami-dade, and palm beach counties. tri-county has no boundaries; we go all over the u.s. whenever we…

Animals
7
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
8
Friends of Bergen County Animal Shelter T/a Focas

Prevention of cruelty to animals

Animals
9
Animal Nation Inc

Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.

Animals
10
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals
11
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
12
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
81/82
Grantees still filing
50/82
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG DOGS HUGE PAWS INC: $130,250 · AnimalsBIG DOGS HUGE PAWS INCLAST RESORT: $45,000 · AnimalsLAST RESORTMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $36,500 · AnimalsMERCY FOR ANIMALS INCTHE SATO PROJECT: $32,000 · AnimalsTHE SATO PROJECTHumane World for Animals Inc: $25,250 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $18,000 · Animals+37 more: $101,637 · Animals+37 moreLULUS RESCUE: $30,750 · OtherLULUS RESCUEST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATIONALMOST HOME WELLNESS CENTER: $25,000 · OtherALMOST HOME WELLNESS CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $18,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBALING TWINE AND HOPE: $17,587 · OtherBALING TWINE AND HOPEAnimal Protection League of NJ: $16,907 · OtherAnimal Protection League of NJST JOSEPH'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherShriners Children's: $12,500 · OtherNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION: $10,000 · OtherNew Jersey Policy Perspective: $10,000 · Other+51 more: $112,500 · Other+51 moreMONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationMONTCLAIR STATE UNIV…THE STORM KING SCHOOL: $60,000 · EducationTHE STORM KING SCHOO…THE TRENTON LITERACY MOVEMENT INC: $8,000 · EducationGARDEN STATE EQUALITY EDUCATIONAL FUND: $6,000 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,000 · HealthCAREPOINT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,500 · Health+3 more: $2,150 · HealthNEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentMADRE INC: $20,000 · InternationalUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC: $5,000 · InternationalNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC: $15,000 · Public Benefit
Animals$388,637Other$293,744Education$174,000Health$34,650Environment$31,000International$25,000Public Benefit$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIG DOGS HUGE PAWS INC: $130,250 over 8y, 11% of budgetMONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE STORM KING SCHOOL: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAST RESORT: $45,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $36,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SATO PROJECT: $32,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLULUS RESCUE: $30,750 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $25,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMADRE INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCAREPOINT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPANION ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY: $12,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC: $11,525 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNew Jersey Policy Perspective: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRENTON LITERACY MOVEMENT INC: $8,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetISLES INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGARDEN STATE EQUALITY EDUCATIONAL FUND: $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGOATS OF ANARCHY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnderhound Railroad: $5,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetLiberty Humane Society Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave A Pet Florida Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAsia Wild: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT CHIMPS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 61% of budgetGREATER ANDROSCOGGIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FARM TEAM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDCOAST HUMANE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLESNIAK INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN LEADERSHIP INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW JERSEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBISSELL Pet Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrinceton Area Community Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Robert Wood Johnson FoundationNJ28× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Greater Good Charities · Columbia Bank Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Petco Love · Verizon Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rosemont Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rosemont Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • New Jersey Citizen Action: 37% of income from government
  • Trenton Downtown Association Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Isles Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Liberty Science Center: 14% of income from government
  • New Jersey Citizen Action Education Fund Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • New Jersey Performing Arts Center Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rosemont Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Rosemont Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosemont’s filings →

More from the funding graph