Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rosemont Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Animals$552kEducation$169kHealth$56kEnvironment$32kInternational$26kHuman Services$19kPublic Benefit$17kCivil Rights$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Last Resort$20,000
ASPCA$6,000
Big Dogs Huge Paws$5,000
UNRWA USA$5,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$5,000
Eleventh Hour Rescue$5,000
New Jersey Conservation Foundation$5,000
MADRE$5,000
Shriners Children's$5,000
SPCALA$5,000
Underhound Railroad Inc$5,000
World Food Program USA$5,000
Freedom Farm Animal Rescue Inc$5,000
Mercy for Animals$5,000
Animal Legal Defense Fund$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Underhound Railroad Inc: $5k → 8%The Brian P Stack Civic Association: $300 → 14%FISHERMAN'S MARK: $1k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$748k · 39 repeat orgs$207k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
59

Total granted

$748k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+18%

Still filing today

74%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +207%
  • TS
    THE STORM KING SCHOOL
    2× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +13%
  • MF
    MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • AH
    ALMOST HOME WELLNESS CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $19k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
The Animal Rescue League
Animals
3
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
6
Tri County Humane Society

Tri-county animal rescue is a no-kill, nonprofit animal shelter working to prevent the killing of over 573,000 unwanted pets in broward, miami-dade, and palm beach counties. tri-county has no boundaries; we go all over the u.s. whenever we…

Animals
7
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
8
Friends of Bergen County Animal Shelter T/a Focas

Prevention of cruelty to animals

Animals
9
Animal Nation Inc

Animal welfare organization providing rescue, rehabilitation, and adoption for wild, domestic, and farmed animals.

Animals
10
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals
11
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
12
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Local Food System Organizat…Equine Therapy ProgramsCommunity FoundationsCommunity FoundationsAnimal Rescue and Shelter
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%36%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%37%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/86
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,479

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
81/82
Grantees still filing
48/82
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BIG DOGS HUGE PAWS INC — $130,250 · AnimalsBIG DOGS HUGE PAWS INCLAST RESORT — $45,000 · AnimalsLAST RESORTMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC — $36,500 · AnimalsMERCY FOR ANIMALS INCTHE SATO PROJECT — $32,000 · AnimalsTHE SATO PROJECTHumane World for Animals Inc — $25,250 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $18,000 · Animals+37 more — $101,637 · Animals+37 moreLULUS RESCUE — $30,750 · OtherLULUS RESCUEST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S HEALTH FOUNDATIONALMOST HOME WELLNESS CENTER — $25,000 · OtherALMOST HOME WELLNESS CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $18,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBALING TWINE AND HOPE — $17,587 · OtherBALING TWINE AND HOPEAnimal Protection League of NJ — $16,907 · OtherAnimal Protection League of NJST JOSEPH'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherShriners Children's — $12,500 · OtherNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION — $10,000 · OtherNew Jersey Policy Perspective — $10,000 · Other+51 more — $112,500 · Other+51 moreMONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationMONTCLAIR STATE UNIV…THE STORM KING SCHOOL — $60,000 · EducationTHE STORM KING SCHOO…THE TRENTON LITERACY MOVEMENT INC — $8,000 · EducationGARDEN STATE EQUALITY EDUCATIONAL FUND — $6,000 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $16,000 · HealthCAREPOINT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $2,500 · Health+3 more — $2,150 · HealthNEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Environment+1 more — $1,000 · EnvironmentMADRE INC — $20,000 · InternationalUNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC — $5,000 · InternationalNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC — $15,000 · Public Benefit
Animals$388,637Other$293,744Education$174,000Health$34,650Environment$31,000International$25,000Public Benefit$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIG DOGS HUGE PAWS INC — $130,250 over 8y, 11% of budgetMONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE STORM KING SCHOOL — $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAST RESORT — $45,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC — $36,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SATO PROJECT — $32,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLULUS RESCUE — $30,750 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $25,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMADRE INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCAREPOINT HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPANION ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY — $12,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC — $11,525 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW JERSEY CITIZEN ACTION — $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNew Jersey Policy Perspective — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRENTON LITERACY MOVEMENT INC — $8,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetISLES INC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGARDEN STATE EQUALITY EDUCATIONAL FUND — $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOATS OF ANARCHY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSave A Pet Florida Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiberty Humane Society Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAsia Wild — $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT CHIMPS — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International — $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ANDROSCOGGIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMIDCOAST HUMANE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FARM TEAM INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN ANIMAL WELFARE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 61% of budgetLIBERTY SCIENCE CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLESNIAK INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN LEADERSHIP INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEW JERSEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER CORPORATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBERGEN COUNTY HORSE RESCUE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBISSELL Pet Foundation — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWARD TRAILS ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPrinceton Area Community Foundation Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Robert Wood Johns…PC Fund for Animals C…Bristol-Myers Squibb …Community Foundation …Greater Good CharitiesColumbia Bank Foundat…Chubb Charitable Foun…Petco LoveVerizon FoundationHumane World for Anim…Petsmart Charities IncPrinceton Area Commun…
The Robert Wood Johnson FoundationNJ28× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Greater Good Charities · Columbia Bank Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Petco Love · Verizon Foundation · Humane World for Animals Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rosemont Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • New Jersey Citizen Action — 37% of income from government
  • Trenton Downtown Association Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Isles Inc — 21% of income from government
  • Liberty Science Center — 14% of income from government
  • New Jersey Citizen Action Education Fund Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
  • New Jersey Performing Arts Center Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue — 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rosemont Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Rosemont Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines