Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rosemary Ewing Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$237kPhilanthropy$61kHuman Services$37kYouth Development$6kRecreation & Sports$5kArts & Culture$4kHealth$3k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$738k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LSU FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED WAY OF NELA$10,000
LA TECH FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF EDUCATION$10,000
GRAMBLING UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
LOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%JOHNNY ROBINSON'S BOYS HOME: $2k → 24%OUACHITA OUTREACH: $8k → 24%OUACHITA OUTREACH: $8k → 24%OUACHITA OUTREACH: $5k → 24%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $1k → 32%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $1k → 32%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION: $500 → 32%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of The Rosemary Ewing Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in LA; by stated purpose, 73%.

The Rosemary Ewing Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 25% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$271k · 10 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$271k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+25%

Still filing today

70%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LSU FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +103%
  • GU
    GRAMBLING UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +317%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LOUISIANA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • OP
    OUACHITA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • PT
    PRIME TIME FAMILY READINGgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +130%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana Children's Research Center Development & Learning Inc

We advance literacy and learning through evidence-based practices in the classroom, home, and community.

Human Services
2
Louisiana School for Math Science and the Arts Foundation Inc

The louisiana school for math, science, and the arts foundation develops and manages resources to complement the work of the louisiana school for math, science, and the arts. the foundation provides for the educational and cultural welfare…

Education
3
Louisiana Association of Educators

Laes mission is to organize and empower local associations in order to promote quality public schools, strengthen the education profession, and improve the well being of members

—
4
Louisiana Resource Center for Educators

Louisiana Resource Center for Educators is dedicated to supporting innovation in education for students, teachers, administrators, higher education, and families.

—
5
The Louisiana Superintendents Academy Co James Meza

Mission of the louisiana superintendent's academy is to respond to the need for strong leadership in louisiana school districts by creating a selective and rigorous professional learning experience to increase the pool of qualified…

Education
6
Lsu Health Foundation New Orleans

The mission of the foundation is to inspire donors to invest in the lsu health sciences center - new orleans ("hsc-no") and its future, to properly steward those contributions, and to help meet the ever evolving needs of the lsuhsc-no by…

Health
7
Lycee Francais De La Nouvelle Orleans

Provide free, public french immersion education and prepare students to matriculate in the finest colleges of the world.

Education
8
University of New Orleans Foundation

The University of New Orleans Foundation's mission is to promote the well-being and advancement of the University of New Orleans and all the colleges, schools, departments, and divisions comprising it, and to develop, expand, and improve…

Education
9
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
10
Louisiana Baptist Childrens Home and Family Ministries

To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.

—
11
Lsu Research Foundation
Community Improvement
12
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Louisiana Endowment for the Humanities; the most unlike its peers is Ouachita Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA TECH FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF EDUCATION: $70,000 · OtherLA TECH FOUNDATION COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONLOUISIANA METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $23,500 · OtherLOUISIANA METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOMEUNITED WAY: $20,000 · OtherUNITED WAYOUACHITA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD: $15,000 · OtherOUACHITA PARISH SCHOOL BOARDEAST BATON ROUGE SCHOOL BOARD: $10,000 · OtherEAST BATON ROUGE SCHOOL BOARD+9 more: $15,000 · Other+9 moreLSU FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationLSU FOUNDATIONGRAMBLING UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationGRAMBLING UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCPRIME TIME FAMILY READING: $12,500 · EducationPRIME TIME FAMILY READINGLOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY O…OUACHITA OUTREACH: $20,300 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesJOHNNY ROBINSON'S BOYS HOME INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $500 · Youth DevelopmentLOUISIANA ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES: $2,500 · Arts & CultureNORTHEAST LA CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$153,500Education$122,500Philanthropy$40,000Human Services$24,300Youth Development$6,000Arts & Culture$3,500Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLSU FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGRAMBLING UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOUACHITA OUTREACH: $20,300 over 3y, 60% of budgetPRIME TIME FAMILY READING: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJOHNNY ROBINSON'S BOYS HOME INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST LA CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LSU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAMBLING UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OUACHITA OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds PRIME TIME FAMILY READING ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA KEY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNNY ROBINSON'S BOYS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST LA CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North LouisianaLA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rosemary Ewing Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rosemary Ewing Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rosemary Ewing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph