Skip to content
The Rosborough Branscum Family Foun at a glance

· Private foundation

The Rosborough Branscum Family Foun

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$96kPublic Safety & Disaster$91kEducation$80kHealth$65kFood & Nutrition$60kHuman Services$50k
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$20,000
WEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD$20,000
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$10,000
GREENWOOD GARDENS$10,000
NEW JERSEY CONSORTIUM FOR IMMIGRANT$5,000
INTERACT THEATER PRODUCTIONS$5,000
MORROW METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
NEW JERSEY ABORTION ACCESS FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $27k → 7%CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY: $6k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $21k → 14%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $25k → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$431k · 12 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$431k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+15%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationInternationalFood & NutritionHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +42%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2020–2023 · $41k · revenue +38%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $33k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +178%
  • SH
    SCOND HARVEST FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
5
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Independent Colleges and Universities of New Jersey a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of the independent colleges and universities of new jersey, a new jersey non-profit corporation is to advance the interests of new jersey's independent, non-profit, public mission institutions of higher education by promoting…

—
9
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Central Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Jersey Abortion Access Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORROW UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $70,100 · OtherMORROW UNITED METHODIST CHURCHJOHNS HOPKINGS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINGS UNIVERSITYSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $30,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKTEMPLE SHAREY TEFILO ISRAEL: $21,250 · OtherTEMPLE SHAREY TEFILO ISRAELARCHER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20,500 · OtherARCHER UNITED METHODIST CHURCHSCOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $15,000 · OtherSCOND HARVEST FOOD BANKMORROW METHODIST CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherMORROW METHODIST CHURCHJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,937 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red…CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC: $33,313 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR HOPE AND S…CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $25,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FOOD ACTIO…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNI…ST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $20,000 · EducationST JOHN'S COLLEGEST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $10,000 · EducationST JOHN'S UNIVERS…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 · InternationalWORLD CENT…WEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD: $30,000 · Food & NutritionGREENWOOD GARDENS: $10,000 · EnvironmentNEW JERSEY ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $5,000 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Health
Other$241,850Human Services$99,250Education$80,000International$50,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Environment$10,000Philanthropy$5,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,937 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC: $33,313 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWEST CHESTER FOOD CUPBOARD: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rosborough Branscum Family Foun funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rosborough Branscum Family Foun. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Center for Hope and Safety Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • St John's College: 2% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosborough Branscum Family Foun’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home