Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Minnesota · Public charity

The Rondo Community Land Trust

Empowering with affordable housing. Strengthen and preserve communities by providing and advocating for permanently affordable, sustainable housing for families and individuals with low to moderate incomes. Promote the utilization of the land trust model as a method of preserving affordable housing, economic growth and neighborhood…

$966k
Granted FY2023
3
Itemized grants FY2023
3
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$210k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$70,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$70,000
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$22M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
West Side Citizens Organization$70,00019%
Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers$70,00012%
Model Cities of St Paul Inc$70,00012%

Compare The Rondo Community Land Trust with peer funders

About The Rondo Community Land Trust

How much does The Rondo Community Land Trust give?
The Rondo Community Land Trust reported 3 itemized grants totaling $210,000, out of $966,466 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does The Rondo Community Land Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Community Improvement (100%).
Who are The Rondo Community Land Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: West Side Citizens Organization ($70k), Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers ($70k), Model Cities of St Paul Inc ($70k).
Where is The Rondo Community Land Trust based?
The Rondo Community Land Trust is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $4.6M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rondo Community Land’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home