Skip to content
The Ronald E & Eleanor J Hall Foundation C/O Argent Trust Oklahoma at a glance

· Private foundation

The Ronald E & Eleanor J Hall Foundation C/O Argent Trust Oklahoma

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$213kPhilanthropy$102kHealth$99kHuman Services$83kArts & Culture$81kEducation$67kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$517k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION FOUNDATION 12 OF 2 YEAR$25,000
SAINT JOHNS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$15,000
BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION$10,000
OU FOUNDATION FBO WILLIAM D ROE PLCENDOWMENT SCHOLARS FUND$5,000
MOUNT ROSE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$2,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,500
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOC$1,500
SAMARITANS PURSE HURRICANE HARVEY RELIEF$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MALAMA OLA FOUNDATION INC$1,000
TEXAS COTTON GIN MUSEUM INC$600
CARMINE HALL BUILDING FUND RENOVATION PROJECT$500
Individual grant recipient$500
NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM$200
AMERICAN LEGION CO RONALD HALL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 16%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
CA
KS
TN
NC
HI
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$523k · 20 repeat orgs$162k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$523k
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+106%

Still filing today

65%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TEXAS COTTON GIN AND MUSEUM
    7× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +123%
  • BU
    BRADLEY UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +1%
  • BV
    BURTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • KH
    KINDRED HOSPICE CARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • SW
    Scott & White Foundation Brenhamgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +137%
  • HC
    HEARTLAND CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
2
Scott & White Hospital-Taylor

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
Scott & White Hospital-Marble Falls

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Scott & White Hospital Brenham

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Baylor Medical Center at Irving

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
12
Scott & White Healthcare

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT JOHNS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST: $189,500 · OtherSAINT JOHNS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRISTBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION: $91,500 · OtherBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATIONTEXAS COTTON GIN AND MUSEUM: $42,200 · OtherTEXAS COTTON GIN AND MUSEUMBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CENTRAL TEXAS: $42,000 · OtherBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CENTRAL TEXASWCHLA SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER: $27,500 · OtherKINDRED HOSPICE CARE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherHEARTLAND CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $20,000 · Other+29 more: $92,750 · Other+29 moreScott & White Healthcare Foundation: $25,000 · HealthScott & Wh…Scott & White Foundation Brenham: $20,000 · HealthScott & Wh…PETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,500 · HealthPETERSON H…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 · HealthMUSCULAR D…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,500 · EducationBURTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $9,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCARMINE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $7,500 · Public Safety & DisasterWASHINGTON ON THE BRAZOS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesUNITY THEATRE CO: $3,750 · Arts & Culture
Other$525,450Health$65,500Education$50,500Public Safety & Disaster$16,500Recreation & Sports$15,000Human Services$8,000Arts & Culture$3,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS COTTON GIN AND MUSEUM: $42,200 over 7y, 10% of budgetScott & White Healthcare Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetScott & White Foundation Brenham: $20,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON ON THE BRAZOS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetBURTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetPETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCARMINE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $7,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITY THEATRE CO: $3,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY FAIR ASSOC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCamp For All Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMBAT MARINE OUTDOORS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice Brazos Valley Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHERIFFS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS COTTON GIN AND MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Scott & White Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Scott & White Foundation Brenham ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON ON THE BRAZOS HISTORICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BURTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds PETERSON HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARMINE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITY THEATRE CO ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY FAIR ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds Camp For All Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMBAT MARINE OUTDOORS INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company Fou…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Shell USA Company FoundationTX11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ronald E & Eleanor J Hall Foundation C/O Argent Trust Oklahoma funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ronald E & Eleanor J Hall Foundation C/O Argent Trust Oklahoma. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ronald E & Eleanor J Hall Foundation C/O Argent Trust Oklahoma’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home