Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Roma Karp Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$647kEducation$564kReligion$275kHuman Services$109kAnimals$75kRecreation & Sports$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kFood & Nutrition$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
$5,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUNY PLATTSBURGH$62,500
GLK FOUNDATION$52,500
CAST INC$30,000
SISTERHOOD OF ST JOSEPH$15,000
MORICHES PAQUATUCK SQUAWS INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FRIENDS OF AINE FOUNDATION$8,000
EAST END HOSPICE$5,500
THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT$5,000
ST ANDREW CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,000
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE$5,000
EAST HAMPTON FOOD PANTRY$4,500
CHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE$4,000
HOLY TRINITY RC CHURCH$4,000
OLD COVE YACHT CLUB INC$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $211k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CAST INC: $40k → 8%EAST END HOSPICE: $6k → 7%CAST INC: $30k → 8%EAST END HOSPICE: $5k → 7%CAST INC: $25k → 8%CAST INC: $25k → 8%CAST INC: $25k → 8%CAST INC: $25k → 8%CAST INC: $20k → 8%EAST END DISABILITY ASSOCIATES INC: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 18 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CAST INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $190k · revenue +35%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF AINE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +171%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $70k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • CL
    Child Life Disaster Relief Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -40%
  • EE
    EAST END DISABILITY ASSOCIATES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +60%
  • HO
    HEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
2
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
3
Chs Services Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

4
Care Dimensions Inc

Care dimensions, inc. (cd) enriches quality of life by providing expert care, support, education, and consultation for those affected by life limiting illness, death, and loss.

5
Hospice East Inc

The mission of hospice east, inc. is to enhance the quality of life for incurably ill persons and their families in clark and powell counties, kentucky by providing physical, social, psychological and spiritual care.

Human Services
6
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
7
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
Catholic Health System of Long Island

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

9
Do for One Nyc

To serve people with developmental disabilities

Human Services
10
Home Aide Service of Eastern New York Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. home aide service of eastern new york is a member of st. peter's…

Health
11
High Peaks Hospice & Palliative Care in

Dignity, comfort and peace at the end of life high peaks hospice & palliative care, inc provides end of life care that listens with respect, cares with compassion, supports with choice, and comforts with understanding wherever you call home

Human Services
12
Hospice & Palliative Care Inc

To provide end of life care, bereavement counseling and spiritual services to the terminally ill and their families in oneida, herkimer, and eastern madison counties, new york.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East End Disability Associates Inc and the most unlike its peers is Old Cove Yacht Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SUNY PLATTSBURGH — $373,500 · OtherSUNY PLATTSBURGHGLK FOUNDATION — $318,500 · OtherGLK FOUNDATIONSISTERHOOD OF ST JOSEPH — $157,000 · OtherSISTERHOOD OF ST JOSEPHIndividual grant recipient — $126,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLY TRINITY RC CHURCH — $103,000 · OtherHOLY TRINITY RC CHURCHCHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE — $98,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCEIndividual grant recipient — $70,000 · OtherCAMP PAQUATUCK FUNDRAISERS INC — $56,500 · Other+4 more — $35,500 · OtherCAST INC — $190,000 · Human ServicesCAST INCEast End Hospice Inc — $10,500 · Human ServicesEAST END DISABILITY ASSOCIATES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF AINE — $104,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF …THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC — $70,000 · HealthTHE CENTER …COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC — $7,000 · HealthChild Life Disaster Relief Inc — $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC — $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterEAST HAMPTON FOOD PANTRY INC — $4,500 · Food & NutritionHEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD — $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,338,000Human Services$210,500Health$181,500Public Safety & Disaster$25,000Youth Development$9,000Housing & Shelter$7,500Food & Nutrition$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAST INC — $190,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF AINE — $104,500 over 5y, 20% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP PAQUATUCK FUNDRAISERS INC — $56,500 over 6y, 15% of budgetChild Life Disaster Relief Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetNORTH FORK PARISH OUTREACH INC — $13,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetEast End Hospice Inc — $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAST END DISABILITY ASSOCIATES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOld Cove Yacht Club Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAST INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AINE
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC
  • Who funds CAMP PAQUATUCK FUNDRAISERS INC
  • Who funds Child Life Disaster Relief Inc
  • Who funds NORTH FORK PARISH OUTREACH INC
  • Who funds East End Hospice Inc
  • Who funds EAST END DISABILITY ASSOCIATES INC
  • Who funds THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT PROJECT INC
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC
  • Who funds EAST HAMPTON FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds HEART OF THE HAMPTONS LTD
  • Who funds Old Cove Yacht Club Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Roma Karp Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 15%
  • Cast Inc15% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Roma Karp Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Roma Karp Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph