Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rogers Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$853k
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Environment$246kEducation$225kHealth$182kReligion$166kArts & Culture$149kHuman Services$96kYouth Development$65kPhilanthropy$63kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 46 grants below total $725,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $852,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $127,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $343k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $325k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Pennsylvania State University$125,000
Soundwaters$100,000
Stanford Museum And Nature Center$50,000
Holy Virgin Protection Russian Orthodox Church$50,000
Noroton Presbyterian Church$40,000
Waveny Lifecare Network$30,000
Greens Ledge Lighthouse Preservation$25,000
The Community Fund Of Darien$25,000
American Corporate Partners$25,000
The Pennsylvania State University$20,000
The Boys' Club of New York$20,000
Greenwich Hospital$15,000
Education Reform Now Inc$12,500
Regional YMCA of Western Connecticut$10,000
The Boys' Club of New York$10,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$898k · 24 repeat orgs$423k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
19

Total granted

$898k
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+3%

Still filing today

75%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $287k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS
    2× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +44%
  • TD
    THE DARIEN FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $36k · revenue +3%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    one grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue +8%
  • BB
    BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -82%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -79%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Wamc

Wamc is chartered by the new york state board of regents to "furnish, prepare and present non-profit and non-commercial educational, instructional and cultural radio programs and also non-profit and non-commercial programs (wamc's mission…

Arts & Culture
4
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
5
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
6
Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc

Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…

Environment
7
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
8
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stepping Stones Museum for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Macro Minds Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Hospital SystemsYmca Community CentersYouth Development CentersLocal History MuseumsEnvironmental Advocacy and …Faith-Based Homeless Servic…Public Library SupportEducation Equity InitiativesPrivate Grantmaking Foundat…Childhood Cancer SupportJewish Community FederationsVolunteer Fire & RescueAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity Theater CompaniesSenior Support ServicesVeteran Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%3%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr14%29%35–55yr20%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%1%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr18%34%20–35yr14%29%35–55yr20%28%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
10%
2,154/22,406

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
19/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Pennsylvania State University — $145,000 · OtherThe Pennsylvania State UniversityNoroton Presbyterian Church — $100,000 · OtherNoroton Presbyterian ChurchGreens Ledge Lighthouse Preservation — $85,000 · OtherGreens Ledge Lighthouse PreservationStanford Museum And Nature Center — $83,000 · OtherStanford Museum And Nature CenterHoly Virgin Protection Russian Orthodox Church — $50,000 · OtherHoly Virgin Protection Russian Orthodox ChurchFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · OtherTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK — $30,000 · OtherTHE ELM PROJECT — $25,000 · Other+25 more — $143,500 · Other+25 moreSOUNDWATERS INC — $150,000 · EnvironmentSOUNDWATERS I…+1 more — $5,000 · EnvironmentWAVENY LIFECARE NETWORK INC — $71,500 · HealthWAVENY LIFE…GREENWICH HOSPITAL — $30,000 · HealthGREENWICH H…The Stamford Hospital — $20,000 · HealthThe Stamfor…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN CA…DARIEN EMS POST 53 INC — $5,000 · HealthICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $45,000 · EducationICAHN SCH…THE DARIEN FOUNDATION INC — $36,000 · EducationTHE DARIE…DARIEN LIBRARY INC — $15,000 · EducationDARIEN LI…EDUCATION REFORM NOW INC — $12,500 · EducationEDUCATION…AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS — $50,000 · Human ServicesREGIONAL YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesAT HOME IN DARIENINC — $11,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FUND OF DARIEN — $52,500 · PhilanthropyMACRO MINDS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $21,500 · Arts & CultureSTEPPING STONES MUSEUM FOR CHILDREN INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureBRUCE MUSEUM INC — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $1,250 · Arts & Culture
Other$696,500Environment$155,000Health$136,500Education$108,500Human Services$101,000Philanthropy$62,500Arts & Culture$60,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUNDWATERS INC — $150,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FUND OF DARIEN — $52,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DARIEN FOUNDATION INC — $36,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELM PROJECT — $25,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $21,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPING STONES MUSEUM FOR CHILDREN INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Stamford Hospital — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC HOUSE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDARIEN LIBRARY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEDUCATION REFORM NOW INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAT HOME IN DARIENINC — $11,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetBROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACRO MINDS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCTC TEN FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDARIEN EMS POST 53 INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ASIA SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARIEN NATURE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBRUCE MUSEUM INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Noroton Fire Department Incorporated — $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGETABOUT INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDarien Community Association Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA BETTER CHANCE IN DARIEN INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE PALACE THEATER GROUP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAMFORD CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT28.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Meredith and Whitney George Family Foundation Inc · The Edward E Hood Jr Foundation · The Goodnow Fund · 522 Foundation Inc · The Weil Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Alexandra Foundation · Pieter and Yvette Eenkema Van Dijk Foundation · Alexander Family Foundation Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · The Darien Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rogers Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Rogers Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $933k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph