Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Robinson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$370k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$3.5MHuman Services$1.6MMembership Benefit$1.2MFood & Nutrition$550kReligion$365kHousing & Shelter$200kYouth Development$110kCrime & Legal$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $532k
  • $250k+1 grant · $370k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Friends of Catholic Education$369,525
Individual grant recipient$81,935
Catholic Charites of Tulsa$75,000
Family and Childrens Services$75,000
Community Food Bank of Eastern OK$50,000
The Spring$50,000
Day Center for the Homeless$50,000
Iron Gate$50,000
the Little Lighthouse$50,000
Neighbor for Neighbor$50,000
Crossover Community Impact$25,000
Reading Partners$25,000
Tulsa Boys Home$25,000
Youth Services$25,000
John 316 Mission$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%John 316 Mission: $25k → 14%John 316 Mission: $25k → 14%John 316 Mission: $25k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $20k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $20k → 14%Neighbors Along The Line: $15k → 14%HAPPY HANDS EDUCATION CENTER: $25k → 15%HAPPY HANDS EDUCATION CENTER: $10k → 15%JOHN 316 MISSION: $50k → 15%TULSA BOYS HOME: $50k → 15%JOHN 316 MISSION: $25k → 15%TULSA BOYS HOME: $25k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $10k → 15%Clarehouse: $10k → 15%Neighbor for Neighbor: $50k → 15%Neighbor for Neighbor: $50k → 15%NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR: $50k → 15%Neighbor for Neighbor: $50k → 15%NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR: $50k → 15%Crossover Community Impact: $25k → 15%Crossover Community Impact: $25k → 15%Crossover Community Impact: $25k → 15%Family and Childrens Services: $85k → 15%Family and Childrens Services: $75k → 15%Family and Childrens Services: $50k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 15%Life Senior Services: $5k → 15%Life Senior Services: $5k → 15%Life Senior Services: $5k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $50k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $40k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $25k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.2M · 36 repeat orgs$365k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
9

Total granted

$6.2M
$265k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+173%

Still filing today

50%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    Family & Childrens Services Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +164%
  • LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +58%
  • IRON GATE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • SP
    STS PETER AND PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY CATHEDRAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • SP
    Sts Peter and Paul School
    one grant, 2022 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
2
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

3
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
4
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
5
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
6
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
7
Tulsa Day Center Inc

To serve those who are experiencing or at risk for homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
8
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
9
Tulsa Volunteers of America Senior Housing Inc

Provides housing to elderly persons under section 202 of the national housing act under agreement with the department of hud.

10
Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc

Community action project of tulsa county inc.'s (cap tulsa) mission is to help young children in lower-income families grow up and achieve economic success.

Human Services
11
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
12
Crossover Health Services Inc

Crossover health services (chs) envisions a christian healthcare movement where faith, strong relationships, and shared resources drive community restoration and eliminate health disparities. we believe that healthcare is a right, not a…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is Institute of Real Estate Management Tulsa Chapter 10. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr15%5%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr13%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr18%61%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr13%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/24
the rest of the field
15%
600/3,921

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Friends of Catholic Education — $2,423,688 · PhilanthropyFriends of Catholic EducationDAY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS — $250,000 · OtherDAY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESSLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $250,000 · OtherLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INCIndividual grant recipient — $231,546 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCatholic Charites of Tulsa — $225,000 · OtherCatholic Charites of TulsaST CATHERINE SCHOOL — $175,000 · OtherST CATHERINE SCHOOLCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $160,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF …CASCIA HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $155,675 · OtherCASCIA HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $120,000 · OtherHoly Family Classical School — $100,000 · Other+21 more — $728,000 · Other+21 moreFamily & Childrens Services Inc — $300,000 · Human ServicesFamily & Childrens…NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGH…JOHN 316 MISSION — $150,000 · Human ServicesJOHN 316 MISSIONTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOME I…CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesCROSSOVER COMMUNIT…NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE — $55,000 · Human Services+4 more — $115,000 · Human Services+4 moreCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $250,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $50,000 · Food & NutritionIRON GATE INC — $250,000 · ReligionTULSA CASA INC — $80,000 · Civil RightsREADING PARTNERS — $25,000 · EducationSTREET SCHOOL INC — $15,000 · EducationMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $20,000 · HealthHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 · Health
Philanthropy$2,423,688Other$2,395,221Human Services$1,095,000Food & Nutrition$300,000Religion$250,000Civil Rights$80,000Education$40,000Health$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFriends of Catholic Education — $2,423,688 over 5y, 66% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc — $300,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $250,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetIRON GATE INC — $250,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC — $250,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $160,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetJOHN 316 MISSION — $150,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $150,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTULSA CASA INC — $80,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC — $75,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE — $55,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $50,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY HANDS EDUCATION CENTER INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetClarehouse Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTREET SCHOOL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Friends of Catholic Education
  • Who funds Family & Childrens Services Inc
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC
  • Who funds IRON GATE INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC
  • Who funds JOHN 316 MISSION
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC
  • Who funds TULSA CASA INC
  • Who funds CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc
  • Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY
  • Who funds HAPPY HANDS EDUCATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC
  • Who funds LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK32.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · The David E & Cassie L Temple Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Oxley Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Flint Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Robinson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc8% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma8% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc1% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Robinson Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Robinson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph