Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert Hopkins and Lorraine Warren Strickler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$414kHealth$108kPublic Safety & Disaster$79kHuman Services$71kFood & Nutrition$51kPhilanthropy$604Membership Benefit$100Crime & Legal$35Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
$13,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Salvation Army of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County$13,400
Massanutten Technical Center Foundation$13,400
Rockingham Memorial Hospital Foundation$13,400
Blue Ridge Area Food Bank$13,400
Massanutten Regional Library$13,400
Blue Ridge Community College Educational Foundation Inc$13,400
Individual grant recipient$9,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 30% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Blue Ridge Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $13k → 8%James Madison University: $30k → 29%Blue Ridge Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $13k → 8%Rockingham Memorial Hospital Foundation: $13k → 11%James Madison University: $29k → 29%Blue Ridge Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $13k → 8%Massanutten Regional Library: $13k → 11%James Madison University: $28k → 29%Blue Ridge Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $13k → 8%Massanutten Technical Center Foundation: $13k → 11%James Madison University: $28k → 29%Blue Ridge Area Food Bank: $13k → 8%massanutten technical center foundation: $13k → 11%James Madison University: $27k → 29%Blue Ridge Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $13k → 8%Massanutten Regional Library: $13k → 11%James Madison University: $27k → 29%Blue Ridge Area Food Bank: $13k → 8%Rockingham Memorial Hospital Foundation: $13k → 11%James Madison University: $25k → 29%Blue Ridge Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $12k → 8%Sunnyside Communities: $10k → 11%Blue Ridge Area Food Bank: $9k → 8%Rockingham Memorial Hospital Foundation: $9k → 11%Blue Ridge Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $12k → 8%Massanutten Regional Library: $9k → 11%Blue Ridge Area Food Bank: $8k → 8%Sunnyside Communities: $9k → 11%Blue Ridge Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $11k → 8%Sunnyside Communities: $9k → 11%Blue Ridge Area Food Bank: $8k → 8%Massanutten Regional Library: $8k → 11%Blue Ridge Community College Educational Foundation Inc: $10k → 8%Sunnyside Communities: $8k → 11%Rockingham Memorial Hospital Foundation: $8k → 11%Massanutten Regional Library: $8k → 11%Rockingham Memorial Hospital Foundation: $8k → 11%Harrisonburg-Rockingham Free Clinic: $8k → 11%Sunnyside Communities: $8k → 11%Sunnyside Communities: $8k → 11%Massanutten Regional Library: $8k → 11%Harrisonburg-Rockingham Free Clinic: $8k → 11%Rockingham Memorial Hospital Foundation: $8k → 11%Rockingham Memorial Hospital Foundation: $8k → 11%Harrisonburg-Rockingham Free Clinic: $8k → 11%Sunnyside Communities: $8k → 11%Massanutten Regional Library: $8k → 11%Massanutten Regional Library: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Robert Hopkins and Lorraine Warren Strickler Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 89%.

The Robert Hopkins and Lorraine Warren Strickler Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$717k · 10 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$717k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+16%

Still filing today

30%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +111%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $51k · revenue +16%
  • MT
    MASSANUTTEN TECHNICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $26k · revenue +79% · 60% of their budget

Funded once

  • BC
    BRIDGEWATER COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -45%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -48%
  • UM
    United Methodist Family Services
    one grant, 2017 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Virginia Community College Educational Foundationinc

To provide for scholarships, faculty & staff development and instructor equipment

Education
2
The Virginia College Fund

Solicitation of public contributions on behalf of member colleges. provides foundations, businesses, and individuals a convenient way of supporting small colleges and universities in virginia.

Education
3
Southwest Virginia Public

Education assistance

—
4
Brightpoint Community College Foundation Inc

The brightpoint community college foundation acquires vital resources that advance the college's mission to provide superior, affordable, and accessible education. the foundation seeks the time, talent, and financial support of alumni,…

Education
5
Beaufort County Community College Foundation Inc

Provides scholarships for beaufort county community college students.

Education
6
Southside Virginia Community College Foundation Inc

To foster and promote the growth, progress and general welfare of the southside virginia community college and the virginia college system.

Education
7
Mountain Gateway Community College Educational Foundation Inc

To support mountain gateway community college by helping to provide an accessible, quality education for students in the service area of the community college, while also providing faculty grants and purchasing new equipment and technology…

Philanthropy
8
The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation
—
9
Virginia Western Community College Educational Foundation Inc

The virginia western community college educational foundation, inc., is an independent not-for-profit foundation dedicated to enhancing community awareness of the college; securing private and public funds for student scholarships, faculty…

Education
10
Northern Virginia Health Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Va Foundation for Independent Colleges

To secure financial support that enables college-bound students to access and graduate from outstanding virginia independent higher education institutions.

Education
12
Virginia Building and Code Officials Association

Serves as the organization for local government building and code enforcement offices within the commonwealth of virginia.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Central Shenandoah Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Harrisonburg Rescue Squad Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $193,950 · OtherJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $109,700 · OtherBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCMassanutten Regional Library: $79,113 · OtherMassanutten Regional LibraryRockingham Memorial Hospital Foundation: $79,112 · OtherRockingham Memorial Hospital FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $71,063 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Salvation Army of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County: $50,750 · OtherThe Salvation Army of Harrisonburg and Rockingham CountyBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $50,750 · OtherBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INCThe Salvation Army: $28,362 · OtherHARRISONBURG-ROCKINGHAM FREE CLINIC INC: $28,362 · Other+6 more: $840 · OtherMASSANUTTEN TECHNICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $26,150 · EducationBRIDGEWATER COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationCUMBERLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100 · PhilanthropyHARRISONBURG RESCUE SQUAD INC: $50 · Health
Other$692,002Education$31,150Philanthropy$100Health$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $109,700 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $50,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHARRISONBURG-ROCKINGHAM FREE CLINIC INC: $28,362 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMASSANUTTEN TECHNICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $26,150 over 2y, 60% of budgetBRIDGEWATER COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAYTON CEMETERY OF VIRGINIA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHARRISONBURG RESCUE SQUAD INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA STATE POLICE ASSOCIATION INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRISONBURG-ROCKINGHAM FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSANUTTEN TECHNICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEWATER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CUMBERLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON CEMETERY OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRISONBURG RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA STATE POLICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham CountyVA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert Hopkins and Lorraine Warren Strickler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert Hopkins and Lorraine Warren Strickler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert Hopkins and Lorraine Warren Strickler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph