Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert F and Joan M Vizza Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$55kEducation$11kReligion$11kHuman Services$6kInternational$6kRecreation & Sports$5kArts & Culture$3kScience & Tech$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$310k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC HEALTH HOME CARE$10,000
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL GOLF$2,800
ST MARY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,632
THE VISCARDI CENTER$2,500
CALVARY HOSPITAL$2,500
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$2,500
ST FRANCIS GUILD JOURNAL AD$400
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE VISCARDI CENTER: $3k → 6%VISCARDI CENTER: $2k → 6%THE VISCARDI CENTER: $2k → 6%VISCARDI CENTER: $2k → 6%VISCARDI CENTER: $500 → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CO
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 22 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
16

Total granted

$96k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+10%

Still filing today

36%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionScience & TechPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VISCARDI CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +43%
  • ML
    MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +52%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $5k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CH
    CATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM (MERCY HOSP)
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • NS
    NYU STERN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
2
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
3
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
4
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
Mercy Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
St Francis Research & Educational Corporation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
9
Good Shepherd Hospice

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
10
Wsnchs North Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
11
Catholic Health System of Long Island

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

—
12
St Peter's Hospital

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. peter's hospital is a member of st. peter's health partners and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Francis Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Womans Club of Glen Cove. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $12,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC HEALTH HOME CARE: $11,000 · OtherCATHOLIC HEALTH HOME CAREST MARY RC CHURCH: $6,010 · OtherST MARY RC CHURCHST JUDES CANCER CENTER: $5,500 · OtherST JUDES CANCER CENTERST FRANCIS HOSPITAL GOLF: $5,300 · OtherST FRANCIS HOSPITAL GOLFCATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM (MERCY HOSP): $5,000 · OtherCATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM (MERCY HOSP)ST MARY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $4,642 · OtherST MARY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCHMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $4,000 · OtherBEREAVEMENT CENTER OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY: $3,000 · OtherNYU STERN SCHOOL: $3,000 · OtherHAITI CHILDREN: $2,600 · Other+13 more: $12,642 · Other+13 moreTHE VISCARDI CENTER INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesTHE VISCARDI CEN…MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $7,650 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $750 · Human ServicesST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $5,000 · HealthST FRANCIS HO…CALVARY HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthCALVARY HOSPI…LETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthLETS WIN PANC…SHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION INC ATTNDDK: $1,000 · HealthSHLOFMITZ HEA…+2 more: $350 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $3,000 · Science & TechSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,500 · ReligionWOMANS CLUB OF GLEN COVE: $105 · Philanthropy
Other$75,394Human Services$16,900Health$13,350Education$3,600Science & Tech$3,000Religion$2,500Philanthropy$105

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE VISCARDI CENTER INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $7,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALVARY HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION INC ATTNDDK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARYHAVEN CENTER OF HOPE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORP: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCUREPSP INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VISCARDI CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds CALVARY HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds LETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHLOFMITZ HEART FOUNDATION INC ATTNDDK ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HELPING HANDS ↗
  • Who funds MARYHAVEN CENTER OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORP ↗
  • Who funds WOMANS CLUB OF GLEN COVE ↗
  • Who funds CUREPSP INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert F and Joan M Vizza Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert F and Joan M Vizza Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Robert F and Joan M Vizza Family Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Robert F and Joan M Vizza Family Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert F and Joan M Vizza Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph