How much did THE ROBERT AND ROSE GLICK grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of THE ROBERT AND ROSE GLICK’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

myeloma researchmultiple myeloma

2019

cemeterymedical

2020

lipper multiplemyeloma lebowlebow myelomaemergencymultiple myelomacancereducation

2021

operationfood insecuritycancereducation

2022

ukrainecancereducationanti-defamation league

2023

ukrainecancer

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k20 grants · $88k
$10k–50k4 grants · $64k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL$25,000
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK$17,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$12,000
GESHER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$10,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$5,000
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL$5,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
JAFINA$5,000
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$5,000
HIAS$5,000
SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGE OF FLORIDA$5,000
HUSHABYE NURSERY$5,000
REBOOT$5,000
GIVE KIDS THE WORLD$5,000
FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of THE ROBERT AND ROSE GLICK’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

THE ROBERT AND ROSE GLICKlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$923k · 27 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$923k

$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%

+65%

Still filing today

56%

44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SC
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK
5× · 2020–2024 · $88k · revenue +2129%
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE
2× · 2018–2020 · $55k · revenue +98%
JF
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA
2× · 2018–2019 · $44k · revenue +6%

Funded once

BR
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITALgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +63%
UW
UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY
one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +23%
TC
TBI CEMETERY ENDOWMENT
one grant, 2019 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center.it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—

National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health

Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc

To mobilize human and financial resources to care for those in need, strengthen jewish life and advance the unity values and shared purpose (see schedule o for continuation)

Philanthropy

Montefiore Health System Inc

To heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve.

Health

Jewish Alliance of Greater Rhode Island

To build and maintain the local and global jewish community by maximizing philanthropic resources, volunteer efforts and social, cultural and educatinal opportunities and, by those efforts, to uphold the following core values: (a)…

Human Services

Miami Children's Health System Inc

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of nicklaus children's hospital and its affiliated entities.

Health

United Jewish Foundation

The united jewish foundation serves as custodian of the detroit jewish community's assets. the foundation is committed to preserving and growing the assets to meet the community's long term needs.

Philanthropy

Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County

To strengthen jewish identity, energize the relationship with israel and meeting human needs that are uniquely the obligation of the jewish community.

Philanthropy

Hackensack Meridian Health Inc

The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities.

Health

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The howard hughes medical institute is a philanthropy that serves society through the direct conduct of biomedical research and support for programs in science education.

Health

United Israel Appeal Inc

Uia is responsible for the allocation and oversight of funds raised by the united states jewish federation campaigns expended in israel by the jewish agency for israel.

International

Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of baptist hospital of miami is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is a…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hias Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/28

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/25

Grantees still filing

19/25

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$723,102Health$90,000Public Safety & Disaster$87,800International$70,000Philanthropy$53,619Community Improvement$30,000Civil Rights$27,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alvin L Glick FoundationMI18.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alvin L Glick Foundation · Jackson Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Louis Glick Memorial & Charitable Trust · Lavery Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE ROBERT AND ROSE GLICK funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GROW JACKSON.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 853704505 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GROW JACKSON, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Robert and Rose Glick?

Find your warmest path to The Robert and Rose Glick through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE ROBERT AND ROSE GLICK

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Robert and Rose Glick?

More from the funding graph

THE ROBERT AND ROSE GLICK

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Robert and Rose Glick?

More from the funding graph