How much did THE RITA J GARTH CHARITABLE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of THE RITA J GARTH CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

children

2019

children

2020

educational

2021

children

2022

—

2023

social religious

2024

childabusesocial religious

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000

Median grant

States reached

$857k

Total assets

Largest grants

MACHNE ISRAEL INC$7,500
BAIS HAKNESSES HAGRA$6,000
VALLEY FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$4,000
NEXT LEVEL YOUTH INC$3,500
SAFEHORIZON$3,000
NETWORK21 - SUPPRTING FAMILIES$3,000
CITY MEALS ON WHEELS$3,000
MACHON L'YAHADUS$2,500
CHABAD OF STARRETT CITY$2,500
MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING$2,500
KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON VE KALLAH INC$2,000
NATIONAL STUTTERING ASSOCIATION$2,000
ITS GOOD TO KNOW$2,000
CROWN HEIGHTS ASSOC FOR BETTERMENT$1,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$199k · 12 repeat orgs$170k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +67% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$199k

$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%

+67%

Still filing today

17%

24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPhilanthropyReligionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TF
TOYS FOR HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN
4× · 2018–2021 · $29k
NS
NATIONAL STUTTERING ASSOCIATION
7× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +87%
RI
RUDERMAN INCLUSION INITIATIVE
4× · 2018–2021 · $27k

Funded once

CF
COALITION FOR HISPANIC FAMILY SERVI
one grant, 2017 · $8k
CO
CHILDREN OF PROMISE
one grant, 2017 · $8k
JC
JEWISH CENTER OF MAUI
one grant, 2023 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Child Study Center of New York

To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.

—

Transitional Services of New York Inc

Provides residential and outpatient services to individuals with persistent mental illness.

Human Services

Brooklyn Kindergarten Society

Bks mission to ensure that the children in its centers develop the social, emotional, physical and cognitive skills they need to succeed.

Education

Project Kesher

Project Keshers mission is to build Jewish community and advance civil society bydeveloping and empowering women leaders.

—

Nassau Suffolk Services for the

Nassau suffolk services for the autistic (nssa) offers hope to people with autism and their families by providing high quality life-long support through services which enable people with autism to function better in everday life. nssa…

Health

Qsac Inc

Qsac is a new york city and long island based nonprofit that supports children and adults with autism, together with their families, in achieving greater independence, realizing their future potential, and contributing to their communities…

Health

Special Needs Network Inc

Special Needs Network provides advocacy resources and services to families raising children with autism and related disorders. Its work focuses on families who live in under-served communities and children of color.

Human Services

Sanctuary for Families Inc

New york's leading service provider and advocate for survivors of domestic violence, sex trafficking and related forms of gender violence.

Human Services

The Kids of Nyu Foundation

The KiDS of NYU Foundation, Inc. (the Organization / KiDS) is a voluntary organization of parents, physicians and friends who support children's services at NYU medical Center through philanthropy, community service and advocacy. KiDS…

Health

Resources for Children With

Provides training, assistance, and information for youth (birth to age 26) with any disability, their families, and professionals who serve them in new york city. includenyc's programs include: help line, workshops and trainings, parent…

Human Services

Splash International

The mission of Splash International (SI) is to ensure clean water for kids. Splash delivers child-focused water, sanitation, hygiene (WASH), and menstrual health programs in partnership with governments in some of the largest, low resource…

Environment

Friends of New York City Nurse Family

To improve the lives of babies and their mothers by providing enhanced benefits for the renowned nurse-family partnership program in new york

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Sunshine Inc and the most unlike its peers is Children of Promise Nyc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/12

Grantees still filing

11/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$297,000Health$41,500Human Services$11,000Crime & Legal$5,000Philanthropy$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,500Youth Development$3,000Religion$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE RITA J GARTH CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SEEDS IN THE MIDDLE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 20.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 271847142 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SEEDS IN THE MIDDLE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Rita J Garth Charitable?

Find your warmest path to The Rita J Garth Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE RITA J GARTH CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Rita J Garth Charitable?

More from the funding graph

THE RITA J GARTH CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Rita J Garth Charitable?

More from the funding graph