Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rita and Alex Hillman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
20
States reached
$877k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$17MHealth$9.4MArts & Culture$4.0MHousing & Shelter$662kScience & Tech$565kHuman Services$277kInternational$275kYouth Development$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$50,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$110M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENN$876,505
UNIVERSITY OF NC AT CHAPEL HILL$340,505
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$224,124
RURAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INSTITUE$200,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$185,411
President and Fellows of Harvard Co$165,409
YALE UNIVERSITY$100,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN$100,000
THE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT$51,875
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$50,000
Rush University Medical Center$50,000
MGH INTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS$50,000
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION$50,000
THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $243k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOODS SERVICES: $50k → 6%SNOWLINE HOSPISCE OF EL DORADO COUN: $50k → 8%PATHWAYS INC: $25k → 13%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $17k → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $17k → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $17k → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $15k → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $15k → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $15k → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $10k → 7%ARIAH Foundation: $10k → 20%YWCA OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 63 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

63 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
69

Total granted

$24M
$3.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+23%

Still filing today

48%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $722k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2024 · $861k · revenue +64%
  • CO
    COMMUNITY OF HOPE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $600k · revenue +42%
  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    3× · 2018–2020 · $600k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF PENN SCHOOL OF NU
    one grant, 2020 · $470k
  • PA
    PROJECT ACCESS OF DURHAM COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $204k · revenue +107%
  • HG
    HIC GRANTEE ARIADNE LABS AUDIT
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Kentucky Research Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Peaceful Presence Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/74
Grantees still filing
60/74
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $3,607,809 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY CAPABLE: $2,949,754 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY CAPABLEBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $2,407,000 · OtherBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INCUNIVERSITY OF PENN SCHOOL OF NURSIN: $1,863,771 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENN SCHOOL OF NURSININTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR PHOTOGRAPH: $1,062,300 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $950,000 · Other+80 more: $8,963,171 · Other+80 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3,098,187 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERS…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $860,825 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSIT…AMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC: $579,651 · EducationAMERICAN NURSES FOUNDAT…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $365,409 · EducationPresident and Fellows o…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $275,000 · Education+18 more: $1,490,472 · Education+18 moreHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $599,999 · HealthNational Nurse-Led Care Consortium: $450,000 · HealthPROJECT ACCESS OF DURHAM COUNTY: $204,389 · HealthCAREOREGON INC: $200,000 · HealthRURAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $200,000 · HealthRush University Medical Center: $100,000 · Health+16 more: $445,075 · HealthCOMMUNITY OF HOPE: $600,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $17,000 · Community ImprovementTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $272,350 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $80,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $29,500 · Arts & CultureGRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $105,100 · Human ServicesWoods Services Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesSNOWLINE HEALTH: $50,000 · Human ServicesPATHWAYS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesAriah Foundation: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesNEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250 · Philanthropy
Other$21,803,805Education$6,669,544Health$2,199,463Community Improvement$617,000Arts & Culture$429,850Human Services$242,600Crime & Legal$25,000Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3,098,187 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $2,407,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $860,825 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE: $600,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $599,999 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC: $579,651 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetNational Nurse-Led Care Consortium: $450,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $365,409 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $275,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $272,350 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPENCE SCHOOL: $210,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAREOREGON INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRURAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $200,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $105,100 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $98,472 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Academy of Nursing: $70,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT: $51,875 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWoods Services Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCare Dimensions Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSNOWLINE HEALTH: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY: $32,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $28,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC: $28,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPATHWAYS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMartin Memorial Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds National Nurse-Led Care Consortium ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds THE SPENCE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ACCESS OF DURHAM COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CAREOREGON INC ↗
  • Who funds RURAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY19.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · The John a Hartford Foundation Inc · The Commonwealth Fund · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · AARP · Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Chicago Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rita and Alex Hillman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rita and Alex Hillman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Liberation Programs Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • University of Portland: 1% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • The Peaceful Presence Project: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Careoregon Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rita and Alex Hillman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Rita and Alex Hillman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 150 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rita and Alex Hillman’s filings →

More from the funding graph