· Private foundation
The Richard William Greenberg Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEEARTH | $2,686 |
| GATHERING FOR WOMEN - MONTEREY 47-4275163 | $2,681 |
| HARMONY AT HOME | $2,681 |
| EVERYONE'S HARVEST 48-1290990 | $2,681 |
| INTERIM INC 51-0159122 | $2,681 |
| GATEWAY CENTER OF MONTEREY COUNTY | $2,681 |
| THE WAHINE PROJECT 45-1154140 | $2,681 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EHEVERYONES HARVEST5× · 2017–2022 · $32k · revenue +147%
- CKCOASTAL KIDS HOME CARE5× · 2017–2021 · $28k · revenue ×13
- MMEARTH6× · 2018–2024 · $24k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- MCMonterey County Rape Crisis Centerone grant, 2018 · $9k · revenue +20%
- SKSPECIAL KIDS CONNECTgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +364%
- VTVETERANS TRANSITION CENTER OF CALIFORNIAgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +181%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Marin Ventures is to serve adults with developmental disabilities by fostering independence, personal growth, and promoting the opportunity for community integration based upon individual need.Marin Ventures is an Adult…
Health Projects Center supports people as they age to live safely at home by delivering high quality services and programs in the Monterey Bay Region.
Providing horse based therapy for handicapped and developmentally disabled adults and children.
Community support for Developmentally Disabled Adults, with a main emphasis on helping people to obtain and maintain real jobs in local businesses.
To promote independent living and full access for people with disabilities through advocacy education and action in our communities.
To empower seniors, disabled adults, veterans, and other under served populations to remain independent by nourishing their bodies, minds, and spirits, and drive out hunger and isolation in our region.
To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities
MCIL was formed to establish, maintain and operate non-profit community service centers to improve the lives of disabled individuals.
Provide continued rehabilitation, hope, and community for people affected by brain injury.
SVILC builds disability identity, culture, pride, creating opportunities for personal and community transformation, and partnering with others to ensure that civil and human rights are protected.
The mission of the housing resource center (hrc) of monterey county is to provide a continuum of housing resources for homeless prevention and affordable housing opportunities. hrc fosters community stability, stronger communities, and…
To provide high-quality, heart-centered, affordable, and accessible psychotherapy to our diverse San Francisco/Bay Area communities. The MCC offers excellent training and supervision for the next generation of mental health professionals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gateway Center of Monterey County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Peninsula Pilates Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EVERYONES HARVEST ↗
- Who funds COASTAL KIDS HOME CARE ↗
- Who funds MEARTH ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY CENTER OF MONTEREY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Monterey County Rape Crisis Center ↗
- Who funds GATHERING FOR WOMEN - MONTEREY ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL KIDS CONNECT ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA PILATES PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HARMONY AT HOME ↗
- Who funds VETERANS TRANSITION CENTER OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Blind & Visually Impaired Center of Monterey County ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL COAST QUALITY OF LIFE PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds JOSEPHINE KERNES MEMORIAL POOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula · Barnet Segal Charitable Trust · Nancy Buck Ransom Foundation · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · Alexander F Victor Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Richard William Greenberg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.