· Private foundation
The Richard and Maude Ferry Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $338k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $156k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION | $105,500 |
| KENNEDY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| ST JAMES CATHEDRAL | $35,000 |
| SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY | $30,000 |
| CRISTO REY JESUIT SEATTLE | $27,500 |
| FRYE ART MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S LOS ANGELES | $25,000 |
| SINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH | $25,000 |
| ARTZ PHILADELPHIA | $25,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES | $25,000 |
| UT HEALTH SAN ANTONIO | $25,000 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LONG BEACH | $25,000 |
| WOMEN'S ACCESSIBLE MEDICAL SERVICES | $20,000 |
| MATT TALBOT CENTER | $20,000 |
| MUSIC CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $191k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of The Richard and Maude Ferry Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in WA; read by stated purpose it is 59% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $313k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +7%
- WAWomen's Accessible Medical Services PS5× · 2020–2024 · $96k · revenue +12%
- SFStudents for Life of America Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $46k · revenue +51%
Funded once
TIMESLIPS CREATIVE STORYTELLING INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -62%- CMCHICAGO METHODIST SENIOR SERVICESone grant, 2021 · $50k
- FLFULL LIFE CAREone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
To improve the quality of life for families challenged by alzheimer's disease or another dementia, through services tailored to meet individual needs.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
The exempt organization's staff and volunteers are committed to providing exceptional professional health care, expert resources, and compassionate support to individuals and their loved ones experiencing the transitions of aging, serious…
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.
Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…
Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence Mount St Vincent Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Eritrean Catholic Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds TIMESLIPS CREATIVE STORYTELLING INC ↗
- Who funds Women's Accessible Medical Services PS ↗
- Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
- Who funds Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California ↗
- Who funds CHARLES & EMMA FRYE FREE PUBLIC ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Elderwise ↗
- Who funds FULL LIFE CARE ↗
- Who funds ARTZ PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED RECREATION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds DUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE SAVANNAH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONCERTS IN MOTION INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds Methow At Home ↗
- Who funds SINGLE MOTHERS OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds I'M STILL HERE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Assistance League of Long Beach ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEALING THE CULTURE ↗
- Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Klm Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Wyman Youth Trust · The Bungie Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · United Way of King County · Knights of Columbus Seattle Council No 676 · Kawabe Memorial Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Richard and Maude Ferry Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Richard and Maude Ferry Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Richard and Maude Ferry Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.