Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Richard L and Freda K Flerlage Foundation C/O Susan Flerlage

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$92k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$122kFood & Nutrition$105kHealth$57kHuman Services$57kHousing & Shelter$45kEnvironment$43kYouth Development$43kEducation$36kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ON THE GROUND GLOBAL$10,000
100 FRIENDS$10,000
HEALTHY FOOD FOR ALL$8,000
SOARING UNLIMITED HAITI$8,000
PENINSULA HOUSING$7,000
YOUTH FARM PROJECT INC$6,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
MAY WE HELP$5,000
TRANSFORM CINCINNATI (COMMUNITY SHARES OF GREATER CINCINNATI)$5,000
FLOW (FOR LOVE OF WATER)$5,000
UPSPRING$3,000
UNADILLA COMMUNITY FARM EDUCATION CENTER INC$2,000
FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY CENTER$2,000
THE EAST END ADULT EDUCATION CENTER$2,000
GIGI'S PLAYHOUSE CINCINNATI$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DOULA ACCESS INITIATIVE: $5k → 16%DOULA ACCESS INITIATIVE: $5k → 16%DOULA ACCESS INITIATIVE: $5k → 16%MADISONVILLE EDUCATION & ASSISTANCE CENTER: $2k → 16%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 7%Madisonville Education & Assistance Center: $1k → 16%Madisonville Education & Assistance Center: $1k → 16%NEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK: $2k → 16%New Life Furniture: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MI
NY
OH
CA
MO
KY
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of The Richard L and Freda K Flerlage Foundation C/O Susan Flerlage’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 28% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 18%.

The Richard L and Freda K Flerlage Foundation C/O Susan Flerlagelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$501k · 34 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
15

Total granted

$501k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+58%

Still filing today

56%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthInternationalFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 1F
    100 FRIENDS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $71k · revenue +37%
  • FL
    FOR LOVE OF WATER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +105%
  • MW
    MAY WE HELP INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $19k · revenue +579%

Funded once

  • KI
    KHUBA INTERNATIONAL QUARTER ACRE FOR THE PEOPLE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • OI
    OUT IN THE OPEN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -59%
  • EA
    EMPIRE AREA COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
2
Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment
3
Groundwork Milwaukee Inc

Bring about the sustained regeneration, improvement, and management of the physical environment by developing community-based partnerships that empower people, businesses, and organizations to promote environmental, economic, and social…

Environment
4
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Action Board

To partner with the community to eliminate poverty and create social change through advocacy and essential services.

Employment
6
Employment Connection

Employment connection is a nonprofit st. louis community asset whose mission is "to assist individuals with limited opportunities to self sufficiency" including those recovering from substance abuse, the homeless, low-income individuals…

—
7
Greater Lansing Food Bank

Partner to alleviate hunger one meal at a time, to create a future where everyone has access to nourishing food.

Food & Nutrition
8
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

—
9
Crossroads Urban Center

Crossroads urban center provides food, clothing, and housing assistance services to low-income individuals and minorities.

Human Services
10
The Food Pantry Network of Licking County

Distribution of food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
11
Local Food Solutions

We work to expand access to local food for more people in the community through the purchase, aggregation, storage, marketing and delivery of fresh, safe, local food in partnership with local growers.

Food & Nutrition
12
Labor Community Strategy Center

The strategy center is a think tank/act tank for regional, national and international movement building, founded in 1988 and based in the 10 million-person world city of los angeles. our campaigns, projects, and publications are rooted in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crayons and Beyond Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peninsula Housing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
17/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTHY FOOD FOR ALL: $30,000 · OtherHEALTHY FOOD FOR ALLTitle Track: $23,000 · OtherTitle TrackTRANSFORM CINCINNATI (COMMUNITY SHARES OF GREATER CINCINNATI): $23,000 · OtherTRANSFORM CINCINNATI (COMMUNITY SHARES OF GREATER CINCINNATI)Center for Transformative Action (for the Youth Farm Project): $19,500 · OtherCenter for Transformative Action (for the Youth Farm Project)1N5: $18,000 · Other1N5MAGDALENE INC (THISTLE FARM): $17,500 · OtherMAGDALENE INC (THISTLE FARM)On the Ground (Chiapas Water Project): $17,300 · OtherOn the Ground (Chiapas Water Project)SOARING UNLIMITED HAITI: $16,000 · OtherON THE GROUND GLOBAL: $15,000 · OtherEAST END ADULT EDUCATION CENTER: $11,000 · OtherMENTORING PLUS INC: $14,000 · OtherUPSPRING: $12,000 · Other+25 more: $100,500 · Other+25 more100 FRIENDS: $71,200 · Education100 FRIENDSYOUTH FARM PROJECT INC: $21,000 · EducationYOUTH FARM PROJECT I…+2 more: $4,000 · EducationFOR LOVE OF WATER: $20,000 · EnvironmentOn The Ground: $15,000 · EnvironmentDoula Access Initiative: $15,000 · Human ServicesMADISONVILLE EDUCATION AND ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesOUT IN THE OPEN INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesNEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK: $3,000 · Human ServicesFriendship Community Center Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesPENINSULA HOUSING: $22,000 · Community ImprovementBreakthrough Cincinnati Inc: $2,000 · Community ImprovementBUCKETS OF RAIN: $13,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalMAY WE HELP INC: $19,000 · HealthSEVEN VALLEYS HEALTH COALITION INC: $2,000 · HealthCENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$316,800Education$96,200Environment$35,000Human Services$27,000Community Improvement$24,000International$23,500Health$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget100 FRIENDS: $71,200 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetTitle Track: $23,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetPENINSULA HOUSING: $22,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetYOUTH FARM PROJECT INC: $21,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetFOR LOVE OF WATER: $20,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMAY WE HELP INC: $19,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetDoula Access Initiative: $15,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetOn The Ground: $15,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetMENTORING PLUS INC: $14,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetBUCKETS OF RAIN: $13,500 over 6y, 12% of budgetUPSPRING: $12,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEAST END ADULT EDUCATION CENTER: $11,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA SOUPE INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCORNERSTONE RENTER EQUITY INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK: $8,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMADISONVILLE EDUCATION AND ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetROW BY ROW: $4,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetOUT IN THE OPEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFriendship Community Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TANDANA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBreakthrough Cincinnati Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEVEN VALLEYS HEALTH COALITION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDress for Success Cincinnati: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR RESPITE CARE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 100 FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds Title Track ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FARM PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR LOVE OF WATER ↗
  • Who funds MAY WE HELP INC ↗
  • Who funds Doula Access Initiative ↗
  • Who funds On The Ground ↗
  • Who funds MENTORING PLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKETS OF RAIN ↗
  • Who funds UPSPRING ↗
  • Who funds EAST END ADULT EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LA SOUPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE RENTER EQUITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK ↗
  • Who funds CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISONVILLE EDUCATION AND ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROW BY ROW ↗
  • Who funds OUT IN THE OPEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE FURNITURE BANK ↗
  • Who funds EMPIRE AREA COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Community Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TANDANA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH30.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Edelweiss Foundation · Robert a & Marian K Kennedy Charitable Trust · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · Millstone Fund · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Trust Estate of George B Riley · Agnes Nordloh Charitable Trust · Unnewehr Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Richard L and Freda K Flerlage Foundation C/O Susan Flerlage funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Richard L and Freda K Flerlage Foundation C/O Susan Flerlage. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Out in the Open Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Richard L and Freda K Flerlage Foundation C/O Susan Flerlage?

Find your warmest path to The Richard L and Freda K Flerlage Foundation C/O Susan Flerlage through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard L and Freda K Flerlage Foundation C/O Susan Flerlage’s filings →

More from the funding graph