Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$990k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
27
Itemized grants FY2025
21
Organizations funded FY2023
48%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$935k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$30,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$75,000
Organizations funded a year
21 to 23
FY2021 to FY2023
Total assets, FY2025
$19M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 48% of the organizations The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 50% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $447k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving27$935k30%
FY202321$887k48%
FY202223$993k91%
FY202123$755kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$1.2MEducation$775kArts & Culture$409kEnvironment$310kYouth Development$225kRecreation & Sports$220kHuman Services$145kCommunity Improvement$130kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
American Cancer Society Inc$75,00010%
Joy of Music Program Inc$53,50014%
Girls Incorporated of Worcester$50,00012%
Community Boating Center Inc$50,00013%
Becker College$50,00010%
North Shore Country Day School$36,50010%
Children's Hospital Corporation$35,00010%
Our Sisters School$25,00011%
Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc$25,00010%
Buzzards Bay Coalition$25,00010%
Raritan Headwaters Association$25,00011%
Mattapoisett Historical Society$20,000114%
Bancroft School$20,00010%
The Trustees of Reservations$20,00010%
Milton Academy$15,00010%
Tewksbury Land Trust a New Jersey$15,00014%
Mattapoisett Land Trust Inc$15,00015%

Plus 45 recipients with no EIN on record ($3.0M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Cancer Society Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJoy of Music Program Inc: $53,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetGirls Incorporated of Worcester: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCommunity Boating Center Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBecker College: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Shore Country Day School: $36,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Sisters School: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBoston Symphony Orchestra Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBuzzards Bay Coalition: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRaritan Headwaters Association: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMattapoisett Historical Society: $20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetBancroft School: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Trustees of Reservations: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMilton Academy: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTewksbury Land Trust a New Jersey: $15,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetMattapoisett Land Trust Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ruth H & Warren a Ellsworth FoundationMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ruth H & Warren a Ellsworth Foundation · The Fred Harris Daniels Foundation · Stoddard Charitable Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation

How much does The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation give?
The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation reported 27 itemized grants totaling $935,000, out of $990,000 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 21 and 23 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (25%), Education (16%), Arts & Culture (9%).
Who are The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: American Cancer Society Inc ($75k), Joy of Music Program Inc ($54k), Girls Incorporated of Worcester ($50k).
Does The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 48% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Ruth H & Warren a Ellsworth Foundation, The Fred Harris Daniels Foundation, Stoddard Charitable Trust.
Where is The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation based?
The Richard and Ann Jprouty Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $1.1M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2025, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard and Ann Jprouty’s filings →

More from the funding graph