Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rhoades-Robinson Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$193kPhilanthropy$171kReligion$130kEducation$106kMembership Benefit$91kPublic Safety & Disaster$84kArts & Culture$37kPublic Benefit$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $71k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHORE SERVICE$15,000
REGION ONE REVOLVING FUN$15,000
SHARON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,750
SHARON FIRE DEPARTMENT$10,000
SHARON HOUSING TRUST INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HISTORIC SHARON BURYING GROUND$8,750
HOTCHKISS LIBRARY OF SHAR$7,500
AMERICAN LEGION$5,000
THE SHARON CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$5,000
CHRIST CHURCH EPISCOPAL$5,000
ST KATERI CARING FUND$5,000
THE SHARON DAY CARE CENTER INC$5,000
THE SHARON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
SHARON HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$889k · 22 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
4

Total granted

$889k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
0%

Still filing today

36%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Membership BenefitEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HISTORIC SHARON BURYING GROUND INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $91k · revenue +529% · 33% of their budget
  • HL
    HOTCHKISS LIBRARY OF SHARON INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $83k · revenue +113%
  • CS
    CHORE SERVICE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • HV
    HOUSATONIC VALLEY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • OW
    OLIVER WOLCOTT TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT (LEONARDO VILLANES)
    one grant, 2018 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sharon Land Trust Inc

The purpose of the trust is to protect and conserve land in the town of sharon ct

Environment
2
Sharon Historical Society

Research Local History

3
Sharon Community Development Corp

The mission of the sharon communty development corporation is to drive community and economic development

Community Improvement
4
Sharon Historical Society-Sharon Springs New York Inc

The mission of the Sharon Historical Society is to make all people aware of our history by linking the past with the present in order to inform them of our future. The Sharon Historical Society exists to inspire people's understanding that…

Arts & Culture
5
Sharon Community Trusts

Community trust

Philanthropy
6
Sharon Country Club Inc

To provide facilities to play golf and other recreational activities. the club maintains a clubhouse with dining facilities for the use and enjoyment of its members.

7
Sharon Country Club

Provide golf recreation to its members

8
The Sharon Cooperative School Inc

We are an early childhood organization that serves preschool children and families in two locations: the Sharon Cooperative School and the Cooperative Nature School; together these schools form the Cooperative Learning Community. We offer…

Education
9
Low Road Sharon Inc
Arts & Culture
10
Salisbury Housing Trust

Affordable housing for salisbury ct

Housing & Shelter
11
New Sharon Community Child Care Center Inc

To provide quality child care

Human Services
12
The Sharon Foundation

The sharon foundation exists solely for the benefit of the presbyterian home at charlotte, inc. (d/b/a the sharon at southpark) and its residents.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sharon Historical Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Equus Effect Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGION ONE REVOLVING FUND — $95,000 · OtherREGION ONE REVOLVING FUNDSHARON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $75,750 · OtherSHARON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCCHORE SERVICE FUND — $45,000 · OtherCHORE SERVICE FUNDSHARON DAY CARE CENTER INC — $42,500 · OtherSHARON DAY CARE CENTER INCSHARON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $40,000 · OtherSHARON UNITED METHODIST CHURCHCHRIST CHURCH EPISCOPAL OF SHARON — $35,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH EPISCOPAL OF SHARONAMERICAN LEGION — $31,000 · OtherSHARON CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH — $30,000 · OtherST KATERI CARING FUND — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $28,000 · OtherSHARON AMBULANCE SERVICES — $25,000 · OtherTRIARTS SHARON PLAYHOUSE — $23,500 · Other+10 more — $94,000 · Other+10 moreTHE HISTORIC SHARON BURYING GROUND INC — $90,750 · Membership BenefitTHE HISTORI…HOTCHKISS LIBRARY OF SHARON INC — $82,500 · EducationHOTCHKISS …CHORE SERVICE INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesCHORE SER…SHARON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $42,000 · Public Safety & DisasterLITTLE GUILD OF ST FRANCIS — $27,000 · AnimalsSHARON HOUSING TRUST INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE EQUUS EFFECT INC — $1,000 · Health
Other$594,750Membership Benefit$90,750Education$82,500Human Services$75,000Public Safety & Disaster$42,000Animals$27,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Health$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE HISTORIC SHARON BURYING GROUND INC — $90,750 over 8y, 33% of budgetHOTCHKISS LIBRARY OF SHARON INC — $82,500 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetCHORE SERVICE INC — $75,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetSHARON DAY CARE CENTER INC — $42,500 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetSHARON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $42,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetLITTLE GUILD OF ST FRANCIS — $27,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSHARON HOUSING TRUST INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSHARON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $13,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetTHE EQUUS EFFECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HISTORIC SHARON BURYING GROUND INC
  • Who funds HOTCHKISS LIBRARY OF SHARON INC
  • Who funds CHORE SERVICE INC
  • Who funds SHARON DAY CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds SHARON FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds LITTLE GUILD OF ST FRANCIS
  • Who funds SHARON HOUSING TRUST INC
  • Who funds SHARON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE EQUUS EFFECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Walter and Phyllis Ann Borten FoundationIL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Walter and Phyllis Ann Borten Foundation · The Hallingby Family Foundation Inc · Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Peter and Helen Haje Foundation · MJPM Foundation · The Mortimer & Barbara Klaus Family Foundation · Low Road Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rhoades-Robinson Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 16%
  • The Equus Effect Inc16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rhoades-Robinson Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Rhoades-Robinson Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph