Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Revlis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.5MInternational$991kHealth$678kFood & Nutrition$495kArts & Culture$464kEnvironment$331kRecreation & Sports$199kReligion$199kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$50,391
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUKE UNIVERSITY$1,001,079
NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND$201,079
THE BREARLEY SCHOOL$200,000
LUSTGARTEN$198,625
CORPSAFRICA$100,552
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$100,540
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN$50,391
EARTH JUSTICE$50,000
SHARE OUR STRENGTH - NO KID HUNGRY$50,000
2025 PRECISION OPHTHALMOLOGY BOOK (COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY)$50,000
NBA FOUNDATION$20,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$10,000
GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $876k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CORPSAFRICA: $101k → 14%CORPSAFRICA: $101k → 14%CORPSAFRICA: $100k → 14%CORPSAFRICA: $100k → 14%NO GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%CORPSAFRICA: $100k → 14%CORPSAFRICA: $100k → 14%GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%CORPSAFRICA: $100k → 14%CORPSAFRICA: $90k → 14%CORPSAFRICA: $60k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 24 repeat orgs$421k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$5.9M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+32%

Still filing today

79%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $249k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +1%
  • C
    CORPSAFRICA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $851k · revenue ×32 · 26% of their budget
  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $475k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • TB
    THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION - MY BROTHERS KEEPER
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • PT
    PUBLIC THEATRE - RESTRICTED - DELACORTE THEATER
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
Columbia University Press

Enhance Columbia University's education mission by acquiring and publishing outstanding original works by scholars and others that contribute to an understanding of global human concerns. Columbia University Press became part of the…

Arts & Culture
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
10
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Inc

The Knight First Amendment Institute defends the freedoms of speech and the press in the digital age through strategic litigation, research, public advocacy and public education. Our aim is to promote a system of free expression that is…

Education
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of Manhattan; the most unlike its peers is Eba Foundation Abigail Black Elbaum Trustee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,056,054 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL: $399,751 · EducationTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL+1 more: $5,000 · EducationSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $475,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHLUSTGARTEN: $198,625 · OtherLUSTGARTENSHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL PUBLIC THEATER- DELACORTE THEATER: $100,000 · OtherSHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL PUBL…PUBLIC THEATRE: $75,232 · OtherGIANTS OF AFRICA: $55,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $50,000 · OtherTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION - MY BROTHERS KEEPER: $50,000 · Other2025 PRECISION OPHTHALMOLOGY BOOK (COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY): $50,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF JERUSALEM INTERNATIONAL YMCA: $50,000 · OtherTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $95,000 · OtherTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUN…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $50,000 · Other+9 more: $185,000 · Other+9 moreCORPSAFRICA: $851,174 · Human ServicesCORPSAFRICA+1 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $603,341 · HealthNEW YORK-PRE…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $85,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN …EARTHJUSTICE: $250,665 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $80,000 · EnvironmentCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN: $150,391 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $50,430 · Arts & CultureWHYHUNGER INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $198,827 · Recreation & Sports
Education$2,460,805Other$1,433,857Human Services$876,174Health$688,341Environment$330,665Arts & Culture$298,321Recreation & Sports$198,827

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $2,056,054 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORPSAFRICA: $851,174 over 9y, 26% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $603,341 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $475,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL: $399,751 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $250,665 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $198,827 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN: $150,391 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $95,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $50,430 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF JERUSALEM INTERNATIONAL YMCA: $50,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetEBA FOUNDATION ABIGAIL BLACK ELBAUM TRUSTEE: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHYHUNGER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetREAD AHEAD INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPARK CHILDREN'S DAY SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CORPSAFRICA ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds THE BREARLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM INTERNATIONAL YMCA ↗
  • Who funds EBA FOUNDATION ABIGAIL BLACK ELBAUM TRUSTEE ↗
  • Who funds GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WHYHUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds READ AHEAD INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK CHILDREN'S DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Revlis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Revlis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Revlis’ filings →

More from the funding graph