Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rendiamo Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$18kPhilanthropy$9kFood & Nutrition$5kInternational$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHealth$2kCivil Rights$500Public Benefit$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$101k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Red Cross$3,000
Community Solutions$3,000
Victoria Elementary School PTA$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Chartwell$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Dressember Foundation: $500 → 13%Sacred Heart Community Service: $800 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19k · 4 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$19k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+31%

Still filing today

50%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $9k · revenue +50%
  • OF
    ODD FELLOW- REBEKAH CHILDRENS HOME OF CALIFORNIA
    3× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +96%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2024 · $2k

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • PR
    PARADISE ROTARY CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue -33%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +578%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
2
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
3
Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara County

The mission of family service agency is to strengthen and advocate for families and individuals of all ages and diversities, helping to create and preserve a healthy community.

Human Services
4
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
5
Didi Hirsch Psychiatric Service

The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…

Health
6
Community Research Foundation Inc

Crf, in partnership with our clients and stakeholders, designs, delivers and evaluates innovative and exemplary behavioral health and social services in a manner that is both culturally and trauma competent, providing these services with…

Unclassified
7
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
8
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

—
9
Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County

Catholic charities of santa clara county serves and advocates for families and individuals in need, especially those living in poverty. rooted in gospel values, we work to create a more just and compassionate community in which people of…

Human Services
10
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
11
The Resource Connection of Amador and Calaveras Counties Inc

The resource connection's mission is to engage families, empower communities, and enrich the lives of the residents of amador and calaveras counties.

Human Services
12
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Solutions for Children Families and Individuals; the most unlike its peers is Paradise Rotary Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GILROY FOUNDATION: $9,113 · OtherGILROY FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS: $9,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALSODD FELLOW- REBEKAH CHILDRENS HOME OF CALIFORNIA: $7,600 · OtherODD FELLOW- REBEKAH CHILDRENS HOME OF CALIFORNIAPARADISE ROTARY CLUB: $3,670 · OtherPARADISE ROTARY CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · Other+3 more: $2,100 · Other+3 moreSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER: $4,500 · Food & NutritionSOUTH COUNT…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $800 · Human ServicesSACRED HEA…Dressember Foundation: $500 · Human ServicesDressember…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,600 · HealthNational FFA Foundation Inc: $500 · Youth DevelopmentWreaths Across America: $500 · Public Benefit
Other$32,983Food & Nutrition$4,500Human Services$4,300Health$1,600Youth Development$500Public Benefit$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGILROY FOUNDATION: $9,113 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetODD FELLOW- REBEKAH CHILDRENS HOME OF CALIFORNIA: $7,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARADISE ROTARY CLUB: $3,670 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS TEACHERS & STUDENTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNational FFA Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDressember Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christopher Ranch FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christopher Ranch Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rendiamo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rendiamo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rendiamo Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Rendiamo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rendiamo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph