· Private foundation
The Rehabvisions & Cariant Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROSE BLUMKIN JEWISH HOME | $15,000 |
| HK'S LAKE OF THE OZARKS OPENHK HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARY MISSION ADVANCEMENT | $10,000 |
| MCPHERSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| ST LUKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| CHI ST SLEXIUS HEALTH DICKINSON FOUNDATION | $1,450 |
| HMH FOUNDATION | $1,250 |
| PALMER MEMORAL FOUNDATION | $1,200 |
| MANNING REGIONAL HEALTHCARE CENTER | $1,000 |
| NFV DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS | $1,000 |
| MANNING REGIONAL GALA | $1,000 |
| LRHF LAKES REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| YMCA OF MOORE COUNTY | $1,000 |
| HARBOR REGIONAL HEALTH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CUCreighton University3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +13%
- SCSHELBY COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +108%
- PMPALMER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- SMSPURGEON MANOR INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +37%
- UOUniversity of Maryone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -12%
- SCSTEPHEN CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the mcrhc foundation is to promote the highest quality health care in mitchell county.
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of God.
The memorial healthcare foundation's mission is to support moundview memorial hospital & clinics through fund raising and public awareness.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.
Support and promote overall health and wellness within the Harper County, Kansas, area and surrounding communities
The mission of the comanche county memorial hospital foundation is to coordinate and encourage financial gifts and community involvement to support the mission of comanche county memorial hospital.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
The minnesota hospital foundation works on strategies that include data-led quality and safety improvement, education, research, training and leadership to improve the health of minnesotans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hrh Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds SHELBY COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds McPherson Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SPURGEON MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds University of Mary ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PALMER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROSSER MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds McPherson County Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF MOORE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MERCY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANNING REGIONAL HEALTHCARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HORN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AUXILIARY AND VOLUNTEERS ↗
- Who funds SCHUYLER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAKES REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORCHARD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TORCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HRH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rehabvisions & Cariant Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.