· Public charity
The Registry Inc
The registry, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 30 grants below total $1,313,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,394,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $80,900 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $332k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $635k
- $250k+1 grant · $303k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE EARLY EDUCATION STATION INC | $302,800 |
| SPROUT CHILDCARE | $215,800 |
| FIVE STAR EDUCATIONAL TRAINING | $84,000 |
| NEW START TRAINING CENTER | $83,900 |
| 4C- FOR CHILDREN | $68,600 |
| LOVE PLAY LEARN | $67,600 |
| THOMPSON'S EARLY CARE IMPROVEMENT SERVICES | $64,400 |
| INVEST SOLUTIONS (ESSENTIAL PROGESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT) | $50,800 |
| JACQ OF ALL TRADES | $44,600 |
| NETWORX LLC | $43,200 |
| CHILD CARE RESOURCE & REFERRAL INC | $32,800 |
| CEMPI LLC | $27,400 |
| 4- C - COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE | $27,200 |
| GARDNER LEARNING CENTER LLC | $20,200 |
| CAREGIVERS UNITED LEADERSHIP ACADEMY | $18,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $317k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $828k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FCFAMILY & CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF NORTHEAST WISCONSIN INC2× · 2023–2025 · $59k · revenue +31%
- WDWESTERN DAIRYLAND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC2× · 2022–2025 · $24k · revenue +13%
- FCFAMILY CONNECTIONS INC2× · 2023–2025 · $19k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- NCNORTHWEST CONNECTION FAMILY RESOURCESone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +10%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Resource & referral child care
Child care connection provides the tools and education to give each child the very best start in life.
Ccc connects families to resources, collaborates with early childhood education programs, and engages with the community to create a foundation for children to be successful in life.
To work with parents, child care providers, businesses and the community to improve access to quality child care and early education so that every child enjoys safe, nurturing and inspiring care.
Child care aware of washington provides thorough and independent information and support for families seeking quality child care, for child care programs seeking to improve quality, and for effective policy making.
Community coordinated child care (4c's) believes in improving and maintaining the health and nutritional status of children in child care while promoting the development of good eating habits.
Child Care Resource and Referral promotes and facilitates affordable quality child care through assistance, education and advocacy in Will, Grundy, Kendall, and Kankakee counties.
Public service for daycare
To enhance the quality of family life in monmouth county by ensuring the highest caliber of safe, affordable and developmentally sound child care services for all children. child care resources invests in monmouth county's children by…
To assist families and child care providers in obtaining education, and quality, affordable child care to help children and families reach their greatest potential.
To offer quality child care at affordable prices.
Young Child Assiciates mission is to keep children safe and to support families in the daily care and guidance of their children. Our programs are designed to promote social, academic and personal growth using large and small group…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family & Childcare Resources of Northeast Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kettle Moraine Ymca Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THRIVING WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE INC ↗
- Who funds 4C For Children Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF NORTHEAST WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL IN ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST CONNECTION FAMILY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds WESTERN DAIRYLAND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDCARING INC ↗
- Who funds KETTLE MORAINE YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARENTING PLACE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thriving Wisconsin Inc · 4C For Children Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Registry Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.