Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Patrick J Oneill Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$500
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Education$134kRecreation & Sports$16kHealth$10kFood & Nutrition$1kReligion$750Youth Development$500Philanthropy$500Other$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$137k · 4 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
15

Total granted

$137k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-2%

Still filing today

25%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED
    3× · 2017–2019 · $127k
  • TR
    THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $8k
  • GC
    GEAUGA COUNTY HUNGER TASK FORCE
    2× · 2017–2021 · $1k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • 1R
    1964 RUGBY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • GA
    GILMOUR ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • 1R
    1694 RUGBY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
2
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
3
The Huntington-Akron Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Cincinnati Shoulder and Elbow Research and Education Foundation Inc
Health
5
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
6
Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio
Health
7
Ohio Scholastic Soccer Coaches Association

Awards to benefit boys/girls high school soccer players in ohio

Youth Development
8
Cleveland Center for Arts and Technology

Mission: for all of our students to achieve optimal health by integrating mental and physical well-being and life purpose. values: we will improve the lives of our students and our community. we will fight inherently inequitable systems.…

Arts & Culture
9
Helping Ohio Heroes

Providing veteran's children with scholarships.

10
Wethersfield Institute for Catholic Thought Inc
11
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
12
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ursuline College and the most unlike its peers is 1964 Rugby Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $126,500 · OtherBENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATEDTHERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $7,940 · OtherTHERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTERGILMOUR ACADEMY INC — $5,000 · Other+10 more — $5,000 · Other1964 RUGBY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Recreation & Sports1964 RUGBY…Saint Martin de Porres High School — $500 · EducationURSULINE COLLEGE — $500 · EducationHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL — $500 · EducationGEAUGA COUNTY HUNGER TASK FORCE — $1,400 · Food & NutritionHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $500 · Human ServicesARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Health
Other$144,440Recreation & Sports$15,000Education$1,500Food & Nutrition$1,400Human Services$500Health$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget1964 RUGBY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetGEAUGA COUNTY HUNGER TASK FORCE — $1,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURSULINE COLLEGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fred a Lennon Charitable TrustOH17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fred a Lennon Charitable Trust · The Cleveland Foundation · The O'Neill Brothers Foundation · The Fedeli Family Charitable Foundation · John P Murphy Foundation · The Laub Foundation · The Veale Foundation · The Howley Foundation · The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation · Murphy Family Foundation · The Lozick Family Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Patrick J Oneill Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph