Skip to content
The Re Uzit Shop of New Holland Inc at a glance

· Public charity

The Re Uzit Shop of New Holland Inc

To make available new and used items of good quality for sale at a low cost to low income people of this and surrounding communities to support the work of mennonite central committee.

$607k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$545k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$4.8MEducation$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $594,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $607,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k9 grants · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $545k
$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE$545,000
NEW HOLLAND EARLY LEARNING CENTER$5,500
FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY$5,500
CROSSNET MINISTRIES$5,500
LIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES$5,500
THE POTTER'S HOUSE$5,500
AARON'S ACRES$5,500
NORTH STAR INITIATIVE$5,500
EXCENTIA HUMAN SERVICES$5,500
UPWARD CALL COUNSELING SERVICES$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY26–26, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%EXCENTIA HUMAN SERVICES: $6k → 9%AARON'S ACRES: $6k → 9%UPWARD CALL COUNSELING SERVICES: $6k → 9%FRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $6k → 9%NORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 3 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +283% since the first grant, against +165% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$5.3M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+283%
+165%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesReligionEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE U S
    10× · 2017–2026 · $4.8M
  • CM
    CROSSNET MINISTRIES
    10× · 2017–2026 · $448k · revenue +283%
  • EL
    EASTERN LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • MD
    MENNONITE DISASTER SERVICE
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • RO
    REVELATIONS OF FREEDOM MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +165%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lighthouse Christian Home and Services Inc

For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.

Human Services
2
Hope Center of Hendersonville

It is our mission to nuture an environment where individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities are valued, provided opportunities, and treated with god's love and compassion.

Religion
3
Lighting the Way Transition House

Counseling service

Crime & Legal
4
Life Training Ministries Inc

Christian counseling for individuals with anxiety depression or other emotional struggles. Christian counseling for marriages and other couples.

Human Services
5
Elevated Community Development Corporation

Training and jobs for exoffenders

Employment
6
Free At Last Ministries Inc

We operate our program as a ministry to address the whole person: spiritual, physical and emotional. we adhere to our core values of excellence, unconditional love and accountability. our program lasts approximately seven months to three…

Religion
7
Life Transforming Ministries

To work in an advisory network capacity with churches in and around the city of coatesville, pa to bring about reconciliation and unity through a christ-like servanthood and humility.

Religion
8
Noahs House

The organization provides opportunities for growth, independence, and fulfillment for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities by offering a loving, nurturing, and affordable residential community, along with structured…

Housing & Shelter
9
Liberty Ministries

The ministry exists to serve offenders in prison and ex-offenders in the community by showing god's love, providing practical assistance, and supporting biblical standards of justice.

—
10
The Remnant House

The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…

Health
11
Philippians 3 13 Ministries

Transitional living for recovered addicts.

Health
12
Lower Light Ministries Inc

Faith based social service that promotes the development and well-being of individuals, families, and the community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friendship Community; the most unlike its peers is New Holland Early Learning Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE U S: $4,846,122 · OtherMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE U S+2 more: $59,500 · OtherCROSSNET MINISTRIES: $448,494 · ReligionCROSSNET …+2 more: $13,800 · ReligionTHE PAI CORPORATION: $5,500 · Human ServicesUPWARD CALL COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesAARON'S ACRES: $5,500 · Human ServicesNORTH STAR INITIATIVE: $5,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP COMMUNITY: $5,500 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE VOCATIONAL SERVICES: $5,500 · EmploymentNEW HOLLAND EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $5,500 · Education
Other$4,905,622Religion$462,294Human Services$27,500Employment$5,500Education$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSNET MINISTRIES: $448,494 over 10y, 6.2% of budgetEASTERN LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY: $49,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetREVELATIONS OF FREEDOM MINISTRIES: $8,300 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Comm…Anabaptist FoundationNatl Christian Charit…Amazonsmile Foundation
Lancaster County Community FoundationPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · Anabaptist Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Re Uzit Shop of New Holland Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Re Uzit Shop of New Holland Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Re Uzit Shop of New Holland Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Re Uzit Shop of New Holland Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Re Uzit Shop of New Holland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home