Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rdm Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$619k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$168k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.6MEducation$639kInternational$232kPhilanthropy$218kHuman Services$100kHealth$14kFood & Nutrition$5kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $174k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $393k
$2,087
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHR SHMUEL$168,140
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT EL YESHIVA CENTER$61,000
ADI ISRAEL FOUNDATION$60,000
THE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND$54,000
MESAMCHEI LEV$50,000
CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC$43,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL$36,000
CONGREGATION AGUDATH ISRAEL$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN LACHOLEH INC$20,000
FLATBUSH JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT TIFRACH$20,000
OHR MEIR UBRACHA$10,000
BNEI EMUNIM$6,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH VCHESED$5,000
THE MRS KAHN BIKUR CHOLIM APARTMENTS INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5k → 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN LACHOLEH INC: $20k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN LECHOLEH INC: $18k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN LECHOLEH INC: $18k → 11%EZRAS CHOLIM D SATMAR: $6k → 20%KEREN ANIYIM INC: $4k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 60 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

60 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
73

Total granted

$2.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+35%

Still filing today

17%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $152k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationInternationalHuman ServicesReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA
    4× · 2018–2024 · $196k · revenue +24%
  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    5× · 2018–2023 · $108k · revenue +145%
  • AI
    Adi Israel Foundation Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $78k · revenue +141%

Funded once

  • I
    INFORMATION
    one grant, 2017 · $516k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
American Friends of Ohel Bas Zion Inc
—
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
6
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
9
Zichroin Rabbeini Meshilem Feiish Ztl Foundation
—
10
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
11
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Torah Btzfat Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
18/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHR SHMUEL: $708,140 · OtherOHR SHMUELINFORMATION: $515,980 · OtherINFORMATIONIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMESAMCHEI LEV: $175,000 · OtherMESAMCHEI LEVIndividual grant recipient: $130,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT TIFRACH: $130,000 · Other+117 more: $847,903 · Other+117 moreCentral Fund of Israel: $108,000 · InternationalAdi Israel Foundation Inc: $78,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC: $36,000 · International+2 more: $860 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA: $196,000 · Education+4 more: $8,400 · EducationTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $54,000 · PhilanthropyOHR MEIR UBRACHA: $10,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR INC FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR: $4,000 · PhilanthropyYESHIVA OHR YISROEL: $3,300 · Philanthropy+6 more: $3,420 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN LACHOLEH INC: $56,000 · Human ServicesEZRAS CHOLIM D SATMAR INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesKEREN ANIYIM INC: $3,600 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesPODEH UMATZEL INC: $8,500 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH VCHESED: $5,000 · ReligionThe Chaya-Israel Foundation Inc: $2,500 · ReligionLEV BEREL INC: $1,360 · Religion+1 more: $100 · ReligionMrs Kahn Bikur Cholim Apartments Inc: $5,000 · HealthGUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC: $3,000 · HealthTAMAR FUND INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$2,707,523International$222,860Education$204,400Philanthropy$74,720Human Services$71,600Religion$17,460Health$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA: $196,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $108,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAdi Israel Foundation Inc: $78,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN LACHOLEH INC: $56,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $54,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOHR MEIR UBRACHA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPODEH UMATZEL INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetEZRAS CHOLIM D SATMAR INC: $6,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH VCHESED: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMrs Kahn Bikur Cholim Apartments Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR INC FRIENDS OF ZICHRON MEIR: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $3,800 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetAmerican Friends of The Rabbinical College Kol Torah Inc: $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKEREN ANIYIM INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chaya-Israel Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL NACHLAS: $2,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetKOLLEL BEER MIRIAM INC: $1,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $1,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAMAR FUND INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANCHOR MENTORING INC: $720 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN DOVID ELIEZER INC: $500 over 1y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ATERET COHANIM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Shaalei Torah Inc: $360 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAH BTZFAT INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIEBER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds Adi Israel Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN LACHOLEH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHALVA ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR MEIR UBRACHA ↗
  • Who funds PODEH UMATZEL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY50.7× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Alyad Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · The Basch Family Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Tzedaka Fund · The Ackerman Family Foundation · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rdm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rdm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rdm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Rdm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 156 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rdm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph