Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Randy and Terri Disselkoen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$170kCivil Rights$136kRecreation & Sports$87kPhilanthropy$35kPublic Benefit$20kHuman Services$6kYouth Development$6kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$3,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$658k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAND HAVEN COAST GUARD FESTIVAL$12,000
FAITH PRAYER & TRACT LEAGUE$10,000
CRU CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$7,000
CASCADE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,300
BIBLICAL LEARNING CENTER$2,000
BRODYS BE CAFE$1,250
UNKNOWN NATIONS$1,000
LIFE TOGETHER FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CASCADE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%CASCADE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$255k · 7 repeat orgs$242k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
18

Total granted

$255k
$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+35%

Still filing today

29%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionPhilanthropyEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CLI MINISTRIES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $105k
  • TT
    THE TRACK LEAGUE
    3× · 2017–2024 · $63k
  • LT
    Life Together Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $29k · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TRACT LEAGUE
    one grant, 2022 · $136k
  • GR
    GERALD R FORD PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +176%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
3
Life Network

Life Network provides support and mentoring to women and men facing unexpected pregnancies; offers parenting support, material resources, and referrals; and promotes sexual risk avoidance through education to foster a culture that values…

Health
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
6
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
7
Field Life

Field life is a nonprofit christian ministry that supports missionaries in their cross-cultural work around the world. field life provides educational and religious activities to support these workers so that they can be healthy and…

Religion
8
West Michigan Christian Foundation

None

Religion
9
Worklife Ministry Inc

To promote and facilitate the highest quality of work life; providing program resources to benefit the region's residents, workplaces and communities.

Religion
10
Love Worth Finding Ministries Inc

To share the gospel throughout the world.

Religion
11
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
12
Union Foundation Us

Rigorous biblical and accessible education, training and resources for churches worldwide.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Life Together Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TRACT LEAGUE: $135,500 · OtherTHE TRACT LEAGUECLI MINISTRIES: $105,000 · OtherCLI MINISTRIESTHE TRACK LEAGUE: $62,500 · OtherTHE TRACK LEAGUECRU MINISTRIES: $20,000 · Other+18 more: $84,088 · Other+18 moreLife Together Foundation: $29,200 · PhilanthropyGRAND HAVEN COAST GUARD FESTIVAL INC: $24,000 · Recreation & SportsGERALD R FORD PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationFAITH PRAYER & TRACT LEAGUE: $10,000 · ReligionLIVING WATER MINISTRY NETWORK: $400 · ReligionWOMEN AT RISK INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 · InternationalUNKNOWN NATIONS: $1,000 · InternationalCascade Community Foundation: $5,300 · Human Services
Other$407,088Philanthropy$29,200Recreation & Sports$24,000Education$20,000Religion$10,400International$6,000Human Services$5,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLife Together Foundation: $29,200 over 3y, 31% of budgetGRAND HAVEN COAST GUARD FESTIVAL INC: $24,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGERALD R FORD PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAITH PRAYER & TRACT LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCascade Community Foundation: $5,300 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN AT RISK INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNKNOWN NATIONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING WATER MINISTRY NETWORK: $400 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Life Together Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GRAND HAVEN COAST GUARD FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GERALD R FORD PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAITH PRAYER & TRACT LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Cascade Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN AT RISK INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BE CAFE ↗
  • Who funds UNKNOWN NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds Faith Hospice ↗
  • Who funds LIVING WATER MINISTRY NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Rapids Community FoundationMI15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Randy and Terri Disselkoen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Randy and Terri Disselkoen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Randy and Terri Disselkoen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph