Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ramsey Community Services Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$315kHousing & Shelter$210kEducation$70kCrime & Legal$68kPublic Safety & Disaster$66kReligion$28kHealth$23kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$50,000
COLLEGE CONNECT CITY OF TEMPE$10,000
ASU$10,000
DILLEY$7,650
SCOTTSDALE FIRE FIGHTERS CHARITIES$5,000
ELAINE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ELAINE: $5k → 11%ELAINE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$572k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$1.2M
$572k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+5%

Still filing today

25%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public Safety & DisasterArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $270k · revenue +274%
  • VO
    VALLEY OF THE SUN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +73%
  • E
    Elaine
    2× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • CA
    CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +74%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Dons of Arizona
Education
2
Tzevet Hatzolah Emergency Response

Ensure that every segment of israeli society is protected from terrorism and is well equipped to respond to life threatening emergencies

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Jewish Federation of El Paso and Las Cruces

Serving the jewish community by engaging, connecting, supporting and celebrating jewish life, values and culture in el paso, las cruces, israel and beyond.

4
Jewish Family & Children's Service of Southern Arizona Inc

Jewish family & children's services of southern arizona helps all people meet their full potential by providing expert community and behavioral health services.

Human Services
5
Greater Phoenix Center for Jewish Philanthropy

To energize and sustain jewish life and leadership throughout greater phoenix, in israel, and around the world.

Human Services
6
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
7
Phoenix Jewish Community Kivel Nursing Home

Operation of assisted living facilities

Health
8
Ziv Partners Inc

Raise funds in support of ziv medical center, which delivers trauma care, advanced mental health treatment, and inclusive healing to israels most diverse and at-risk communities.

Health
9
Shabbat Project Arizona

Shabbat Awareness

Religion
10
Jewish Caring Network Gevuras Yarden Inc

assistance with serious illness

Health
11
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Enriching the lives of Jewish students and staff at Arizona State University through dynamic and innovative programming which deepens understanding of and creates excitement for Jewish life SO THEY MAY ENRICH THE JEWISH PEOPLE, ISRAEL AND…

12
Jewish Family Service of Colorado Inc

Improving the lives of individuals and families in need throughout colorado by taking an integrated approach to delivering comprehensive support services.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Phoenix Fire Fighters Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Public Safety Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $455,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $187,369 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $150,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYIndividual grant recipient — $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLLEGE CONNECT CITY OF TEMPE — $64,500 · Other+20 more — $216,802 · Other+20 moreFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $270,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITE…INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterUNITED PHOENIX FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 · Public Safety & DisasterCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterElaine — $10,000 · Human ServicesFYXX FOUNDATION — $7,113 · Animals
Other$1,423,671Arts & Culture$270,000Public Safety & Disaster$52,500Housing & Shelter$50,000Human Services$10,000Animals$7,113

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $270,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetElaine — $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFYXX FOUNDATION — $7,113 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetDESERT GATHERINGS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetUNITED PHOENIX FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds VALLEY OF THE SUN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds Elaine
  • Who funds FYXX FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DESERT GATHERINGS INC
  • Who funds UNITED PHOENIX FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ramsey Community Services Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ramsey Community Services Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ramsey Community Services Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph