Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Radnor Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$120kAnimals$30kRecreation & Sports$25kHealth$22kPhilanthropy$20kEducation$12kArts & Culture$11kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$661k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
TAMPA JCC FEDERATION$5,000
ST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT$5,000
CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK$5,000
NORTH FORK ARTS CENTER$3,000
EMERY UNIVERSITY$1,000
THE FRASER CENTER INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PHOENIX RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 11%PAN MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE: $1k → 7%NORTH FORK ARTS CENTER: $3k → 7%ASPCA: $5k → 17%ON BIKES: $3k → 13%NERANANENAH INC: $3k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%SHE MIGHT: $10k → 11%NORTH FORK ARTS CENTER: $3k → 7%ASPCA: $5k → 17%TAMPA JCC FEDERATION: $5k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%SHE MIGHT: $10k → 11%NORTH FORK ARTS CENTER: $3k → 7%ASPCA: $5k → 17%TAMPA JCC FEDERATION: $5k → 13%THE FRASER CENTER: $2k → 14%VOICES FOR THE VOICELESS: $5k → 11%ASPCA: $5k → 17%TAMPA JCC FEDERATION: $5k → 13%THE FRASER CENTER INC: $1k → 14%ST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT: $10k → 11%ASPCA: $5k → 17%TAMPA JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 13%THE FRASER CENTER INC: $1k → 14%ST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT: $10k → 11%ASPCA: $5k → 17%TAMPA JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%ST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT EPISCOPAL: $10k → 11%WOMEN OF REFORM JUDAISM: $5k → 17%TAMPA JCC FEDERATION: $5k → 13%ST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT: $10k → 11%TAMPA JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 13%ST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT EPISCOPAL: $10k → 11%TAMPA JEWISH FEDERATION: $5k → 13%ST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT: $5k → 11%TAMPA JCC FEDERATION: $5k → 13%ST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT: $5k → 11%CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $5k → 13%CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $5k → 13%CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $5k → 13%CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $5k → 13%CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $5k → 13%CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $5k → 13%CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $5k → 13%CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $5k → 13%CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 10 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$229k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+8%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    TAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +10%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    6× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +67%
  • OI
    ONBIKES INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $8k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • PG
    PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +8%
  • WO
    WOMEN OF REFORM JUDAISM
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • VF
    VOICES FOR THE VOICELESS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +62%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
3
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
7
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
8
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frazer Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEK: $45,000 · OtherCONGREGATION SCHAARAI ZEDEKST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT: $40,000 · OtherST ANTHONY ON THE DESERTIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT EPISCOPAL: $20,000 · OtherST ANTHONY ON THE DESERT EPISCOPALEMORY UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherEMORY UNIVERSITYWOMEN OF REFORM JUDAISM: $5,000 · Other+4 more: $8,000 · Other+4 moreTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC: $45,000 · Recreation & SportsTAMPA JCCFEDERATION …THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $30,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN …PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $10,000 · ReligionNORTH FORK ARTS CENTER INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureONBIKES INC: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentVOICES FOR THE VOICELESS INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsEmory University: $1,500 · Education
Other$148,000Recreation & Sports$45,000Animals$30,000Religion$10,000Arts & Culture$8,000Youth Development$7,500Civil Rights$5,000Education$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH FORK ARTS CENTER INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetONBIKES INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVOICES FOR THE VOICELESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FRAZER CENTER INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH FORK ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ONBIKES INC ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR THE VOICELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRAZER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Radnor Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Radnor Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Tampa Jccfederation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Onbikes Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Radnor’s filings →

More from the funding graph