Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rachel & Barney Gottstein Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$312kInternational$120kHuman Services$110kArts & Culture$20kHousing & Shelter$20kHealth$19kEducation$8kEnvironment$5kOther$257k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $74k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND$20,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL$12,000
THE FOUNDATION FOR THE WELFARE OF HOLOCAUST VICTIMS$12,000
LANIADO DEVELOPMENT FUND$10,000
LEV CHABAD INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Israel Guide Dog Ctr for the Blind: $25k → 6%Israel Guide Dog Center for the Blind: $25k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $12k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$546k · 14 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$546k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+49%

Still filing today

71%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
    6× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +65%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $80k · revenue +181%
  • AC
    Alaska Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired
    4× · 2018–2022 · $70k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • BT
    BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
2
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
3
Adi Israel Foundation Inc

Aleh Israel Foundation, Inc.(The Foundation)is a Foundation that provides support to rehabilitative centers caring for most severely disabled children in Israel.

International
4
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
5
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
6
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Israel Organizations Inc

Funding of organizations qualified under section 501(c) or equivalent as operating for charitable, religious, or educational purposes, or that would so qualify based on the nature of such organization's operations

International
9
American Friends of Latet Humanitarian Aid Inc

None

International
10
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Ateret Cohanim Inc

Encourage and promote the study and observance of jewish religious traditions and culture through seminars, newsletters, tours, internet and website, support various children's activities, provide aid for security equipment in support of…

International
12
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Alyn Hospitalinc and the most unlike its peers is Anchorage Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $230,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $62,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC+2 more — $20,100 · Philanthropy+2 moreAlaska Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired — $70,000 · OtherAlaska Center for the Blind and Vis…LUBAVICH JEWISH CENTER OF ALASKA — $51,700 · OtherLUBAVICH JEWISH CENTER OF ALASKALubavitch Jewish Center of Alaska — $39,000 · OtherLubavitch Jewish Center of AlaskaIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAmer Friends of Chaiyanu — $20,000 · OtherAmer Friends of ChaiyanuTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE WELFARE OF HOLOCAUST VICTIMS — $17,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR THE WELFARE OF H…Individual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $10,000 · Other+8 more — $16,588 · Other+8 moreFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC — $80,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ISRA…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $20,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC — $20,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIEND…ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $110,000 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE D…AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureBeans Cafe Inc — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterLANIADO DEVELOPMENT FUND INC — $10,000 · HealthLEV CHABAD INC — $8,700 · Health
Philanthropy$312,100Other$269,288International$120,000Human Services$110,000Arts & Culture$20,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Health$18,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $230,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $110,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC — $80,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAlaska Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired — $70,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $62,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBeans Cafe Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $10,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHAIYANU — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLEV CHABAD INC — $8,700 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HAKOTEL INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetANCHORAGE PARK FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rachel & Barney Gottstein Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rachel & Barney Gottstein Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Rachel & Barney Gottstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph