Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rabinovitch Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$163k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$523kRecreation & Sports$184kHuman Services$75kEnvironment$70kInternational$70kReligion$58kHealth$45kScience & Tech$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$55,000
Israel ParaSport Center$27,500
FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF$11,000
Shalom Institute - Shemesh Farms$10,000
Jewish Communal Fund$10,000
THE CARBON UNDERGROUND$10,000
THE MACCABI USASPORTS FOR ISRAEL$10,000
American Friends of Israel Navy Sea$10,000
Hirshberg Foundation$5,000
Senior Concerns Adult Daycare Fund$5,000
PJ LIBRARY$5,000
CONCERN FOUNDATION$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PJ LIBRARY: $5k → 17%THE MACCABI USASPORTS FOR ISRAEL: $10k → 22%Senior Concerns Adult Daycare Fund: $5k → 10%Jewish Communal Fund: $10k → 17%Hillel International: $10k → 14%Israel ParaSport Center: $100k → 14%THE MACCABI USASPORTS FOR ISRAEL: $5k → 22%Senior Concerns Adult Daycare Fund: $5k → 10%American Friends of Israel Navy Sea: $25k → 17%Israel ParaSport Center: $28k → 14%THE MACCABI USASPORTS FOR ISRAEL: $5k → 22%Senior Concerns Adult Daycare Fund: $5k → 10%The First Tee of Los Angeles: $5k → 14%American Friends of Israel Navy Sea: $10k → 17%Israel ParaSport Center: $27k → 14%THE MACCABI USASPORTS FOR ISRAEL: $5k → 22%Senior Concerns Adult Daycare Fund: $5k → 10%Hirshberg Foundation: $5k → 14%American Friends of Israel Navy Sea: $10k → 17%THE MACCABI USASPORTS FOR ISRAEL: $5k → 22%American Friends of Israel Navy Sea: $10k → 17%American Friends of Israel Navy Sea: $10k → 17%CONCERN FOUNDATION: $18k → 14%CONCERN FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%CONCERN FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%CONCERN FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%CA Community Fnd - Wildfire Relief: $10k → 14%The Foundation of Camp Bob Waldorf: $7k → 14%Shalom Institute - Shemesh Farms: $10k → 14%THE CARBON UNDERGROUND: $10k → 14%THE CARBON UNDERGROUND: $10k → 14%THE CARBON UNDERGROUND: $10k → 14%THE CARBON UNDERGROUND: $10k → 14%THE CARBON UNDERGROUND: $10k → 14%THE CARBON UNDERGROUND: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME: $25k → 14%Wilshire Boulevard Temple: $10k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $85k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $77k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $75k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $70k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $56k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $55k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $45k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF: $11k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $10k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF: $7k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$990k · 13 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$990k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+5%

Still filing today

54%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHealthYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CARBON UNDERGROUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +10%
  • CF
    CONCERN FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +30%
  • OH
    OUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $17k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • WB
    WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
Young Judaea Global Inc

Young judaea is a diverse community that educates and empowers jewish youth to deeply engage with israel and to lead positive change for the jewish people, israel and the world.

Education
4
Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc

Jewish summer camp is the enduring and irreplaceable connection and community that strengthens jewish identity, develops jewish leadership, and ensures a jewish future. foundation for jewish camp (fjc) is the only nonprofit whose singular…

Youth Development
5
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

6
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

7
University of Judaism Foundation
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

9
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
10
Jack E & Rachel Gindi Foundation

The organization's charitable giving is directed to the jewish community and community at large for the benefit of organizations that provide education and religious benefits and services.

Philanthropy
11
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
12
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Communal Fund and the most unlike its peers is The Carbon Underground. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES — $473,207 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LO…Israel ParaSport Center — $154,300 · OtherIsrael ParaSport CenterAmerican Friends of Israel Navy Sea — $70,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of Israel Navy SeaShalom Institute - Shemesh Farms — $37,500 · OtherShalom Institute - Shemesh FarmsSenior Concerns Adult Daycare Fund — $30,000 · OtherSenior Concerns Adult Daycare FundLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME — $25,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOMEHirshberg Foundation — $20,000 · Other+7 more — $47,000 · Other+7 moreTHE CARBON UNDERGROUND — $70,000 · EnvironmentTHE FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF — $37,800 · Recreation & SportsMACCABI USA INC — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsCONCERN FOUNDATION — $40,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $10,000 · PhilanthropyOUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER — $17,000 · HealthSAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE — $5,000 · HealthHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $10,000 · ReligionLOS ANGELES MISSION INC — $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Youth Development$473,207Other$383,800Environment$70,000Recreation & Sports$67,800Philanthropy$50,000Health$22,000Religion$10,000Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES — $473,207 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetTHE CARBON UNDERGROUND — $70,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF — $37,800 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetMACCABI USA INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER — $17,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST TEE OF LOS ANGELES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds THE CARBON UNDERGROUND
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF
  • Who funds MACCABI USA INC
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
  • Who funds FIRST TEE OF LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rabinovitch Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rabinovitch Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Rabinovitch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph