· Private foundation
The R & G Connors Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $5k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RANDALL HOLMGREN FOR CHILDREN IN LE | $30,000 |
| UVU UCCU CENTER | $3,500 |
| CAMERON BULLOCK FOR CURTIS | $500 |
| ROBIN DEMOTTE FOR AMY | $300 |
| JENNIFER HAYDEN FOR WIDOW OF CHURCH | $117 |
| Individual grant recipient | $117 |
| JOHN BOND'S FAMILY | $117 |
| GREG MIKAT'S FAMILY | $116 |
| SARAH KUNZLER FOR PHELPS FAMILY | $116 |
| THELMA ARMSTRONG'S FAMILY | $116 |
| Individual grant recipient | $116 |
| WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFOUNDATION FOR PRADER-WILLI RESEARCH INC4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +69%
- THTifie Humanitarian2× · 2020–2024 · $600 · revenue +71%
- WFWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $317 · revenue +29%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $5k
- TRThe Rachel Covey Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
Unitus Labs provides consulting support loans grants and investments to partner organizations who are implementing innovative market-based approaches to reducing global poverty with potential for very large scale impact.
World trade center utah accelerates growth for utah companies through our global networks, programs, and services.
The mission of the Sunstone Education Foundation is to sponsor open forums of Mormon thought and experiences.
Gamechanger leverages technology and innovation to help children and their families who encounter life threatening illnesses.
Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…
The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…
Funding solar energy solutions, building capacity, and amplifying local leadership for those experiencing the greatest impacts from climate change, economic instability, and social injustice.
Working to advance rate disease support to improve the lives of people affected by rare diseases.
Empower families with the skills, strategies, and support they need to manage pain and medical anxiety. We give people not just information, but a path to self-advocacy and action.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Hypersomnia Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR PRADER-WILLI RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds The Rachel Covey Foundation ↗
- Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
- Who funds Stand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love ↗
- Who funds Tifie Humanitarian ↗
- Who funds HYPERSOMNIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THANKSGIVING POINT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Shelter Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds BACKPACK PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE JOHN A & LEAH D WIDTSOE FOUNDATION FKA THE JOHN A WIDTSOE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The R & G Connors Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.