· Private foundation
The Quaker Hill Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k149 grants · $128k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $146k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY | $30,550 |
| HURRICANE ISL OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL | $29,350 |
| THE OPEN DOOR | $24,800 |
| INST FOR THE DEVEL OF HUMAN ARTS | $20,500 |
| NATL CTR FOR COMPETENCY BASED LRNG | $14,000 |
| ECCF GREATER LAWRENCE SUMMER FUND | $13,350 |
| C10 RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FNDN | $13,000 |
| HIRAM COLLEGE | $7,500 |
| CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL | $7,244 |
| NAMI SEATTLE | $5,350 |
| BRYN MAWR COLLEGE | $5,100 |
| ENDICOTT COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| NORTHWEST OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY | $4,550 |
| BOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL | $3,950 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
118 repeat relationships — 89 still active in FY2021, 29 since wound down; 64 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC5× · 2017–2021 · $107k · revenue +61%- HIHURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL5× · 2017–2021 · $81k · revenue +10%
- MMMINNESOTA MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART3× · 2018–2020 · $23k · revenue +253%
Funded once
- CNCHORUS NORTH SHOREone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -43%
- KSKIPP SO CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SCHone grant, 2020 · $20k
- EGECCF GRTR LAWR SUMMER FUNDone grant, 2017 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Education and Research
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walker Art Center and the most unlike its peers is Dalekoarts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 294 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds HURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds School Garden Project of Lane County ↗
- Who funds CHORUS NORTH SHORE ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds HIRAM COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NAMI Seattle ↗
- Who funds GIVING VOICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Literacy Council of Northern Virginia Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPETENCY BASED LEARNING ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds C 10 Research & Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ENDICOTT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BLUE WATER THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Northwest Outward Bound School ↗
- Who funds GOVERNOR DUMMER ACADEMY THE GOVERNOR'S ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds TURNING THE PAGE ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds CHILDHAVEN ↗
- Who funds BALLARD FOOD BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Nathaniel & Elizabeth P Stevens Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Longview Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · The K Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Quaker Hill Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Roxbury Stone House Inc — 29% of income from government
- Police Assisted Addiction and Recovery Initiative Inc — 16% of income from government
- School Garden Project of Lane County — 9% of income from government
- Essex County Greenbelt Association — 8% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc — 3% of income from government
- Essex Art Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Grub Street Inc — 2% of income from government
- Governor Dummer Academy the Governor's Academy — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College — 1% of income from government
- Endicott College — 1% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
- Trinity College — 0% of income from government
- Farm and Wilderness Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Bennington College Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.