Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Qadeer Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$69kPublic Safety & Disaster$41kArts & Culture$5kInternational$3kPhilanthropy$2kFood & Nutrition$1kHealth$698Other$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,625
Median grant
4
States reached
$159k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,074
Individual grant recipient$7,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF MELVILLE$5,300
BANGLA BAZAR JAME MASJID$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LONG ISLAND MUSLIM SOCIETY$2,625
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA$1,395
ISLAMIC CENTER OF DEER PARK$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
BMANA$200
META PLATFORMS INC$38
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $1k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $48 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Qadeer Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 73%.

The Qadeer Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$185k · 10 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +453% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
25

Total granted

$185k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+453%
+0%

Still filing today

40%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $1k · revenue +578%
  • MI
    MedGlobal Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $700 · revenue +453%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2019–2020 · $245 · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • S
    SRIC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IC
    ISLAMIC CENTER OF SHELTER ROCK
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
4
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
5
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
6
Strategic Global Response

Strategic Global Response effectively and efficiently delivers life-saving care to people affected by humanitarian crises, in the most challenging situations on earth

Human Services
7
Islamic Relief Usa

Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.

International
8
Global Fund for Assistance Inc

The mission of Global Fund for Assistance Inc is to mobilize resources and connect donors to high-impact organizations worldwide, supporting humanitarian relief, poverty reduction, and sustainable development initiatives that improve lives…

Philanthropy
9
Pure Hands Inc

Pure Hands, Inc.s mission is preservation of human lives by elimination of hunger through detection, prevention and treatment of malnutrition. Pure Hands, Inc. tackles the underlying causes of malnutrition and poverty during and after…

International
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
12
Muso Inc

Muso works to create a cure for delay because no one should die waiting for health care.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is North American Bangladeshi Islamic Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $127,640 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLONG ISLAND MUSLIM SOCIETY INC: $28,925 · OtherLONG ISLAND MUSLIM SOCIETY INCISLAMIC CENTER OF MELVILLE: $10,800 · OtherISLAMIC CENTER OF DEER PARK: $8,500 · Other+23 more: $46,362 · Other+23 moreNORTH AMERICAN BANGLADESHI ISLAMIC COMMUNITY INC: $3,500 · ReligionFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1,443 · Human ServicesGOFUNDMEORG: $1,000 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $50 · PhilanthropyMedGlobal Inc: $700 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $245 · HealthYEMEN AID INC: $270 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $107 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $105 · InternationalUnited Hands Relief Inc: $101 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50 · InternationalMUSLIM AID AMERICA: $500 · Public Safety & DisasterAxiom REACH Inc: $103 · Crime & Legal
Other$222,227Religion$3,500Human Services$1,443Philanthropy$1,050Health$945International$633Public Safety & Disaster$500Crime & Legal$103

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH AMERICAN BANGLADESHI ISLAMIC COMMUNITY INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1,443 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMedGlobal Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSLIM AID AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYEMEN AID INC: $270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $245 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $107 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAxiom REACH Inc: $103 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Hands Relief Inc: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN BANGLADESHI ISLAMIC COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds MedGlobal Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIM AID AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds YEMEN AID INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Axiom REACH Inc ↗
  • Who funds United Hands Relief Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Qadeer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Qadeer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Qadeer’s filings →

More from the funding graph