Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Qadeer Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0175% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Religion$69kPublic Safety & Disaster$41kArts & Culture$5kInternational$3kPhilanthropy$2kFood & Nutrition$1kHealth$698Other$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,625
Median grant
4
States reached
$159k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,074
Individual grant recipient$7,000
ISLAMIC CENTER OF MELVILLE$5,300
BANGLA BAZAR JAME MASJID$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LONG ISLAND MUSLIM SOCIETY$2,625
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA$1,395
ISLAMIC CENTER OF DEER PARK$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
BMANA$200
META PLATFORMS INC$38
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $1k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $48 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of The Qadeer Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 73% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Qadeer Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$185k · 10 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +453% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
25

Total granted

$185k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+453%
+0%

Still filing today

40%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2019–2024 · $1k · revenue +578%
  • MI
    MedGlobal Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $700 · revenue +453%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2019–2020 · $245 · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • S
    SRIC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IC
    ISLAMIC CENTER OF SHELTER ROCK
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
4
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
5
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
6
Strategic Global Response

Strategic Global Response effectively and efficiently delivers life-saving care to people affected by humanitarian crises, in the most challenging situations on earth

Human Services
7
Islamic Relief Usa

Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.

International
8
Global Fund for Assistance Inc

The mission of Global Fund for Assistance Inc is to mobilize resources and connect donors to high-impact organizations worldwide, supporting humanitarian relief, poverty reduction, and sustainable development initiatives that improve lives…

Philanthropy
9
Pure Hands Inc

Pure Hands, Inc.s mission is preservation of human lives by elimination of hunger through detection, prevention and treatment of malnutrition. Pure Hands, Inc. tackles the underlying causes of malnutrition and poverty during and after…

International
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
12
Muso Inc

Muso works to create a cure for delay because no one should die waiting for health care.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is North American Bangladeshi Islamic Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $127,640 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLONG ISLAND MUSLIM SOCIETY INC — $28,925 · OtherLONG ISLAND MUSLIM SOCIETY INCISLAMIC CENTER OF MELVILLE — $10,800 · OtherISLAMIC CENTER OF DEER PARK — $8,500 · Other+23 more — $46,362 · Other+23 moreNORTH AMERICAN BANGLADESHI ISLAMIC COMMUNITY INC — $3,500 · ReligionFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $1,443 · Human ServicesGOFUNDMEORG — $1,000 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $50 · PhilanthropyMedGlobal Inc — $700 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $245 · HealthYEMEN AID INC — $270 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $107 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $105 · InternationalUnited Hands Relief Inc — $101 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50 · InternationalMUSLIM AID AMERICA — $500 · Public Safety & DisasterAxiom REACH Inc — $103 · Crime & Legal
Other$222,227Religion$3,500Human Services$1,443Philanthropy$1,050Health$945International$633Public Safety & Disaster$500Crime & Legal$103

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH AMERICAN BANGLADESHI ISLAMIC COMMUNITY INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $1,443 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMedGlobal Inc — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSLIM AID AMERICA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYEMEN AID INC — $270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $245 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $107 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAxiom REACH Inc — $103 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Hands Relief Inc — $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN BANGLADESHI ISLAMIC COMMUNITY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG
  • Who funds MedGlobal Inc
  • Who funds MUSLIM AID AMERICA
  • Who funds YEMEN AID INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds Axiom REACH Inc
  • Who funds United Hands Relief Inc
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ11.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Qadeer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph