· Private foundation
The Present Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $290k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY | $215,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $75,000 |
| PROJECT MORRY | $25,200 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ INC | $20,100 |
| MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM | $15,000 |
| BEST FOOT FORWARD FOUNDATION INC | $6,250 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF NEW JERSEY INC | $6,250 |
| AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS INC | $5,000 |
| SANTAS SILENT HELPERS OF COLUMBUS INC | $5,000 |
| OVERLOOK FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| NEW JERSEY SEEDS INC | $5,000 |
| GILDA'S CLUB GRAND RAPIDS | $5,000 |
| GAVIN FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY5× · 2020–2024 · $898k · revenue +29%
Northwestern University4× · 2020–2023 · $202k · revenue +33%- CFCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $52k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- SDSUMMIT DOWNTOWN INCone grant, 2020 · $350k · revenue -61% · 28% of their budget
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +39%- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELANDone grant, 2020 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj and the most unlike its peers is Horizons Newark Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT DOWNTOWN INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY SEEDS INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds OVERLOOK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds BEST FOOT FORWARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds MISSION4MAUREEN ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
- Who funds America Scores New England DBA Boston Scores ↗
- Who funds Sweet Dream Makers Inc ↗
- Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAGE ELDERCARE ↗
- Who funds Santas Silent Helpers of Columbus Inc ↗
- Who funds AMATUER HOCKEY ASSOC ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds GAVIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER NEWARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GILDA'S CLUB GRAND RAPIDS ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF THE ORANGES ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT 100 PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · The Summit Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Linda Sue Pfarrer Nortillo Charitable Foundation · The Mark and Jane Wilf Family Foundation Inc · The Healthcare Foundation of New Jersey Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Present Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- America Scores New England Dba Boston Scores — 30% of income from government
- Bridges Outreach Inc — 25% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Gavin Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Montclair Art Museum — 11% of income from government
- Summit Downtown Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way of Palm Beach County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sage Eldercare — 1% of income from government
- New Jersey Performing Arts Center Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.