Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Polaris Foundation

$15k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Philanthropy$893kYouth Development$16kArts & Culture$11kEducation$10kHealth$10kHuman Services$6kFood & Nutrition$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boys Girls Club$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Northwest Community Action: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
NY
IA
CO
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Community Action Program Inc

The mission of NCCAP is to act as an advocate, provider, and facilitator of programs and services for low-income individuals in Lincoln, Marathon, and Wood Counties (WI). NCCAP seeks to create opportunities for people and communities to…

Community Improvement
2
Lakes and Prairies Community Action Partnership Inc

Lakes & prairies community action partnership (caplp) is celebrating 60 years of providing services and working to achieve our mission to eliminate poverty by empowering families and engaging communities. our services are designed to…

Human Services
3
Arc Northland

To promote and protect the rights of people with disabilities and their families while supporting inclusion and participation in the community throughout their lifetime.

—
4
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
5
West Central Minnesota Communities Action Inc

Empowering people while providing services and resources that impact individuals and communities.

Community Improvement
6
Community Action of Southeast Iowa

The organization is dedicated to alleviating the conditions and causes of poverty by building partnerships and strengthening people through quality services. community action of southeast iowa administers programs funded or supported by…

—
7
Northeast Ne Community Action Partnershi Partnership

Assist in reducing poverty by creating opportunities which enhance the social and economic capacity of low-income & other eligible persons.

—
8
Northeast Iowa Community Action Corp

Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.

Human Services
9
Community Action Partnership of North Dakota Inc

Serve as a catalyst for training, technical assistance, program development, evaluation, research, fundraising, and public education for community action agencies in north dakota.

Human Services
10
Northspan Group Inc

Part iii line 1 - briefly describe the organizations mission:our vision is to engage and elevate those we serve. our mission is to be expert navigators, transforming ideas into accomplishments. northspan is a critical resource for…

—
11
Kootasca Community Action Inc

The mission of KOOTASCA Community Action, Inc. is "Building Community to End Poverty." This is done by helping low income people build assets, providing high quality early childhood education, and engaging the community through…

—
12
Brightspark Early Learning Services

To nurture and sustain child-centered, antiracist early learning communities.Our work is to:1) Help families access high quality childcare and after-school care.2) Increase the availability of high-quality care through coaching and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Twin Cities United Way; the most unlike its peers is Northland Shooting Sports Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $892,103 · PhilanthropyGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyBoys Girls Club: $15,000 · OtherNational MS Society: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,279 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherRoseau Food Shelf: $1,711 · Other+17 more: $11,585 · OtherFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PARTNERSHIP PLAN FOR STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2,500 · EducationNORTHWEST COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $1,604 · Human ServicesNORTHWOODS HOMELESS SHELTERS INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterBATTLE GROUND HEALTHCARE: $500 · Health
Philanthropy$892,603Other$44,575Arts & Culture$10,000Education$2,500Human Services$1,604Housing & Shelter$1,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $892,103 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP PLAN FOR STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNORTHWEST COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $1,604 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOODS HOMELESS SHELTERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBATTLE GROUND HEALTHCARE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HAVEN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP PLAN FOR STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWOODS HOMELESS SHELTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMAS-WASHOUGAL COMMUNITY CHEST ↗
  • Who funds BATTLE GROUND HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds LAKES AREA YOUTH TRAP CLUB ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND SHOOTING SPORTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Polaris Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Polaris Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Polaris Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Polaris Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Polaris’ filings →

    More from the funding graph