Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pines Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$63kHealth$39kInternational$14kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$4kAnimals$4kCommunity Improvement$4kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$108k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$2,000
WORLD GOSPEL MISSION$2,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATON$2,000
WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL$2,000
LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK$1,500
ST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
ST MATTHEWS COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER$500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$500
CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY$500
POULNOT CATHERINE MICHELE SCHOLARSHIP FUND MUSC FOUNDATION$500
THE SNOW FOUNDATION$500
BARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC$500
ANTIOCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH$500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHARLESTON$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $500 → 17%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1k → 12%THE SNOW FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%FORT VALLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 18%ANTIOCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $500 → 22%THE GOLDEN RULE: $800 → 23%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $3k → 19%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $500 → 17%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1k → 12%THE SNOW FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%ANTIOCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $500 → 22%THE GOLDEN RULE: $600 → 23%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $3k → 19%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $500 → 17%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1k → 12%ANTIOCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $500 → 22%THE GOLDEN RULE: $500 → 23%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $3k → 19%CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $500 → 17%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1k → 12%ANTIOCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $500 → 22%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $3k → 19%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $750 → 12%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $3k → 19%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $750 → 12%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $2k → 19%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $600 → 12%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $2k → 19%ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $600 → 12%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $2k → 19%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $2k → 19%LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%ST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1k → 12%ST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1k → 12%ST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1k → 12%ST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1k → 12%ST MATTHEWS COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER: $750 → 12%ST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $750 → 12%ST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $600 → 12%ST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $600 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
MO
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$141k · 25 repeat orgs$850 to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
3

Total granted

$141k
$850

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+4%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalAnimalsCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +115%
  • LF
    LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +72%
  • CA
    CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • WM
    WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ABACO RELIEF
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue +4%
  • JW
    JOHN WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
6
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
7
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
8
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
10
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water Missions International; the most unlike its peers is The Golden Rule Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORT VALLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $22,800 · OtherFORT VALLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHWORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $21,500 · OtherWORLD GOSPEL MISSIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATON: $12,400 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATONLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $10,100 · OtherLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INCST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $7,200 · OtherST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCHST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $6,750 · OtherST MATTHEWS LUTHERAN CHURCHPOULNOT CATHERINE MICHELE SCHOLARSHIP FUND MUSC FOUNDATION: $3,500 · OtherST MATTHEWS COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER: $3,300 · Other+9 more: $9,100 · Other+9 moreNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $11,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE …RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHARLESTON SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $3,400 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HO…THE GOLDEN RULE INC: $2,600 · HealthTHE GOLDEN RULE IN…American Heart Association Inc: $2,300 · HealthAmerican Heart Ass…CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,300 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH IN…BARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $13,500 · InternationalWATER MISS…CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $3,600 · AnimalsCoastal Crisis Chaplaincy: $3,500 · Community ImprovementTHE SNOW FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$96,650Health$22,850International$13,500Animals$3,600Community Improvement$3,500Philanthropy$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $10,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $3,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCoastal Crisis Chaplaincy: $3,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHARLESTON SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $3,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOLDEN RULE INC: $2,600 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SNOW FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Coastal Crisis Chaplaincy ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHARLESTON SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOLDEN RULE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SNOW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pines Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pines Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pines’ filings →

    More from the funding graph