· Private foundation
The Phyllis & Donald Epstein Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AUSTRIAN-AMERICAN COUNCIL WEST | $25,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $15,000 |
| OPERATION SMILE | $15,000 |
| TUNNELS TO TOWERS | $10,000 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| MERCY SHIPS | $10,000 |
| UNITED IN HARMONY | $5,000 |
| LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WAGS AND WALKS ADOPTION CENTER | $5,000 |
| FARM SANCTUARY | $5,000 |
| LANGE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 78% of The Phyllis & Donald Epstein Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 35% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 14%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.
152 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 143 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- OSOPERATION SMILE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $21k · revenue +14%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC5× · 2020–2024 · $17k · revenue +78%- LALOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS7× · 2017–2023 · $16k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- WAWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE ARTSone grant, 2017 · $20k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
- ACANGELA CITY PITT BULLSone grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.
World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.
Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.
We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
How this is measured
111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 111 of the 250 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AUSTRIAN-AMERICAN COUNCIL WEST ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds NPR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TREEPEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds LANGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED IN HARMONY ↗
- Who funds I Stand With My Pack Inc ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Sempra Foundation · Bernard Weinberg Foundation · Paula Knickerbocker Foundation Inc · Gat Family Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · Grace and Li Yu Family Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation · American Express Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Phyllis & Donald Epstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Phyllis & Donald Epstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- National Park Trust Inc: 51% of income from government
- Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
- From the Top Inc: 6% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Phyllis & Donald Epstein Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Phyllis & Donald Epstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Phyllis & Donald Epstein’s filings →