Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Phillips Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$168k
Granted FY2023
19
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$530kPhilanthropy$228kYouth Development$144kReligion$87kHealth$75kCivil Rights$74kHuman Services$37kHousing & Shelter$28kOther$0
02FY2023 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k13 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
$5,904
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEACE FELLOWSHIP$35,000
ST MARYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$30,000
FFTC$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NAPLES PRIDE$10,000
LOVE ON A MISSION$10,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$7,265
Individual grant recipient$7,265
BUCKEYE COUNCIL BOYS SCOUT$7,265
Individual grant recipient$5,904
MANSFIELD CITY SCHOOLS$5,000
CENTER STREET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENT$5,000
RICHLAND OUTREACH CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RICHLAND OUTREACH CENTER: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
CA
KY
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 21 repeat orgs$343k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 13 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
22

Total granted

$1.0M
$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+345%

Still filing today

19%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Youth DevelopmentEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DISCOVERY SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $192k · revenue +47%
  • LO
    LOVE ON A MISSION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +57% · 34% of their budget
  • LS
    LAWRENCE SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNITY OF NAPLES
    one grant, 2022 · $64k
  • BR
    BLUE ROSE MISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • BH
    BUCKEYE HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
2
Nami of Richland County Ohio

Our mission is to improve the quality of life, ensure dignity and respect for persons with mental illness, and to support their families.

Health
3
Special Olympics Michigan Inc

The special olympics movement uses sport as a vehicle for acceptance, respect, inclusion, dignity, and joy. we provide year-round sports training and competition for children and adults with intellectual disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
4
Redwood Day School

Redwood day inspires students to reach for their next challenge, embrace differences and develop the intellectual and emotional courage to be ready for anything.

Education
5
Red Oak Community School

A primary school in central Ohio offering a learner-centered approach to education for families dedicated to cultivating joy in learning, fostering self-confidence and agency, and preparing students to be environmental stewards and…

—
6
Rossman School

Provide a strong, well-balanced education in a nurturing school community committed to excellence.

—
7
Riverbank Charter School of Excellence

The Mission of Riverbank Charter School of Excellence is to provide students with opportunities to develop their intellectual, emotional, and social potential through the implementation of a dynamic curriculum that fosters learning through…

Education
8
Richmond Friends School Inc

Committed to providing a quality educational experience for each child, creating an environment that nurtures individual intellectual, emotional, creative, spiritual, and physical gifts within a community

Education
9
Rocky Mount Academy

Rocky mount academy is an independent school with the mission to prepare its students for the challenges, opportunities, and responsibilities that they will encounter in life and college.

Education
10
Rochester Arts & Science Academy Foundation

Rasa aims to develop active learners, well rounded individuals, and engaged world citizens. our teachers channel children's natural curiosity to develop lifelong inquirers prepared to thrive in a diverse world. as an international…

Education
11
Royal Palm Academy Inc

The mission of royal palm academy is to partner with families to provide an education of rich academics with catholic formation. we teach the mind, educate the heart, and form the character of tomorrow's leaders.

Human Services
12
Rimland Services Nfp

Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-Ohio Youth Mentoring; the most unlike its peers is Naples Pride Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $207,765 · OtherST MARYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITY OF NAPLES: $63,598 · OtherUNITY OF NAPLESFFTC: $63,000 · OtherFFTCCENTER STREET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENT: $55,000 · OtherJULIE BILLIART SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $46,408 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $46,408 · Other+39 more: $495,936 · Other+39 moreRICHLAND COUNTY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · PhilanthropyRICHLAND COUNT…+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyDISCOVERY SCHOOL INC: $191,500 · EducationDISCOVERY SCH…LOVE ON A MISSION: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentMID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING: $14,700 · Youth DevelopmentNAPLES PRIDE INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsRICHLAND OUTREACH CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesRICHLAND ACADEMY OF THE ARTS: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,128,115Philanthropy$202,000Education$191,500Youth Development$49,700Civil Rights$10,000Human Services$5,000Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRICHLAND COUNTY FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDISCOVERY SCHOOL INC: $191,500 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetLOVE ON A MISSION: $35,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetLAWRENCE SCHOOL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING: $14,700 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetRIDERS UNLIMITED INC: $13,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetNAPLES PRIDE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetRICHLAND ACADEMY OF THE ARTS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBuilding Blocks Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RICHLAND COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVE ON A MISSION ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING ↗
  • Who funds RIDERS UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES PRIDE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richland County FoundationOH17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richland County Foundation · The Robert and Esther Black Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Phillips Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Phillips Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Phillips Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph