How much did THE PHILIP & BARBARA LONG FAMILY grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 82% of THE PHILIP & BARBARA LONG FAMILY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

youth sportshopeoutreach

2021

memory

2022

homeless housing

2023

memoriamoutreachhousing

2024

outreachhousingworcester

2025

presbyterianhopeoutreach

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k17 grants · $34k
$10k–50k2 grants · $46k

$1,500

Median grant

States reached

$2.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

TIDAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$35,000
CHILD & FAMILY FOUNDATION$11,000
ASBURY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$9,000
APPALACHIAN SERVICE PROJECT$5,500
ONE YEAR TO EMPOWERMENT$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUND OF EASTERN SHORE$2,000
LIFE CRISIS CENTER$2,000
ST FRANCIS DE SALES CHURCHSCHOOL$1,750
FALCONS YOUTH SPORTS$1,600
COASTAL HOSPICE$1,500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,500
HORIZONS SALISBURY$1,000
VILLAGE OF HOPE$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
ROCKAWALKIN CHURCH$250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$579k · 29 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$579k

$204k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%

+16%

Still filing today

34%

11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HS
HORIZONS SALISBURY
6× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +130%
CF
CHILD & FAMILY FOUNDATION
2× · 2024–2025 · $24k · revenue +295%
CH
CHESAPEAKE HOUSING MISSION
3× · 2022–2024 · $16k · revenue +241%

Funded once

SF
ST FRANCIS DE SALES CHURCH
one grant, 2018 · $84k
A
ASA
one grant, 2018 · $20k
CC
CATHOLIC CHARITIES
one grant, 2018 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Hopeworks of Howard County Inc

Hopeworks mission is to provide support and advocacy for people in howard county

Human Services

Caroline County Humane Society Inc

The society provides an animal shelter for the residents of caroline county, md

Animals

University of Maryland Upper Chesapeake Health System Inc

To assist in the management of and to provide services to related healthcare affiliates.

Health

Hope Center of Maryland Inc

Assist low-income families

Food & Nutrition

Hospice of the Chesapeake Foundation Inc

To support hospice of the chesapeake, inc., hospice of charles county, calvert hospice in their mission to improve the quality of life for those in our communities experiencing advanced illness or bereavement through hospice, palliative…

—

Salisbury Neighborhood Housing Svcs Inc

The organization is dedicated to residential revitalization and the promotion of home ownership in salisbury, maryland.

Community Improvement

Humane Society of Wicomico County Inc

The humane society is working to make a difference in the lives of animals and the people who love and care for them, and is dedicated to relieving the pain and suffering of animals through education and direct intervention.

Animals

Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc

Upper chesapeake medical center is dedicated to maintaining and improving the health of the people in its communities through an integrated health delivery system that provides high quality care to all. ucmc is committed to service…

Health

Chesapeake Care Resources Inc

To provide quality services that enhance and improve life for individuals who have a disability.

Health

Baltimore Outreach Services Inc

Baltimore Outreach Services, Inc. is a 24-hour, 7 day per week shelter for women and their children, providing wrap around case management services and assistance with moving them to independent housing.

Human Services

Caroline Human Services Council Inc

Plan,coordinate and facilitate projects and programs to benefit children, youth and families.

Human Services

Shepherds Staff Inc

A christian outreach and support center serving those in need in carroll county, maryland.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coastal Hospice and the most unlike its peers is University of Maryland Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/19

Grantees still filing

12/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$653,276Education$62,766Human Services$27,050Youth Development$23,500Housing & Shelter$21,100Health$2,000Recreation & Sports$1,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Eastern ShorMD35.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Eastern Shor · Richard a Henson Foundation Inc · Franklin P and Arthur W Perdue Foundation · United Way of the Lower Eastern Shore · Donnie Williams Foundation Inc · Salisbury Wicomico Economic · Joan W Jenkins Foundation Inc · Jack Burbage Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE PHILIP & BARBARA LONG FAMILY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

10get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FRUITLAND COMMUNITY CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 521884888 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FRUITLAND COMMUNITY CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 31% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Philip & Barbara Long Family?

Find your warmest path to The Philip & Barbara Long Family through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE PHILIP & BARBARA LONG FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Philip & Barbara Long Family?

More from the funding graph

THE PHILIP & BARBARA LONG FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Philip & Barbara Long Family?

More from the funding graph